144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36707313)
1. Proof testing to improve the reliability and lifetime of ceramic dental prostheses.
Jadaan O; Esquivel-Upshaw J; Nemeth NN; Baker E
Dent Mater; 2023 Feb; 39(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 36707313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Time-dependent fracture probability of bilayer, lithium-disilicate-based, glass-ceramic, molar crowns as a function of core/veneer thickness ratio and load orientation.
Anusavice KJ; Jadaan OM; Esquivel-Upshaw JF
Dent Mater; 2013 Nov; 29(11):1132-8. PubMed ID: 24060349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Zirconia-based versus metal-based single crowns veneered with overpressing ceramic for restoration of posterior endodontically treated teeth: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.
Monaco C; Llukacej A; Baldissara P; Arena A; Scotti R
J Dent; 2017 Oct; 65():56-63. PubMed ID: 28736293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.
Hosseini M; Kleven E; Gotfredsen K
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 22867804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses?
Anusavice KJ; Kakar K; Ferree N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18 Suppl 3():218-31. PubMed ID: 17594384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized controlled clinical trial of 3-unit posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with layered or pressed veneering ceramics: 3-year results.
Naenni N; Bindl A; Sax C; Hämmerle C; Sailer I
J Dent; 2015 Nov; 43(11):1365-70. PubMed ID: 26234623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lifetime prediction of zirconia and metal ceramic crowns loaded on marginal ridges.
Fardin VP; de Paula VG; Bonfante EA; Coelho PG; Bonfante G
Dent Mater; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1543-1554. PubMed ID: 27697333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The fracture load and failure types of veneered anterior zirconia crowns: an analysis of normal and Weibull distribution of complete and censored data.
Stawarczyk B; Ozcan M; Hämmerle CH; Roos M
Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 22196897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Zirconia versus metal: a preliminary comparative analysis of ceramic veneer behavior.
Augstin-Panadero R; Fons-Font A; Roman-Rodriguez JL; Granell-Ruiz M; del Rio-Highsmith J; Sola-Ruiz MF
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 22545261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics.
Lin WS; Ercoli C; Feng C; Morton D
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 22462639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of crown design and material on chipping-resistance of all-ceramic molar crowns: An in vitro study.
Alsarani M; Souza G; Rizkalla A; El-Mowafy O
Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 30152633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of multiple firings on fracture load of veneered zirconia restorations.
Hensel J; Reise M; Liebermann A; Buser R; Stawarczyk B
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Jun; 130():105213. PubMed ID: 35385808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of core thickness differences on post-fatigue indentation fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns.
Alhasanyah A; Vaidyanathan TK; Flinton RJ
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 23387466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital versus conventional veneering of zirconia and cobalt chromium crowns: Fracture load before and after thermomechanical aging.
Mayinger F; Meinen J; Coldea A; Zimmermann M; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):251.e1-251.e8. PubMed ID: 37244796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture load of metal-ceramic, monolithic, and bi-layered zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses after thermo-mechanical cycling.
López-Suárez C; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Rodríguez-Alonso V; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ
J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():97-104. PubMed ID: 29678585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Veneering Methods on Zirconia Framework-Veneer Ceramic Adhesion and Fracture Resistance of Single Crowns.
Kanat-Ertürk B; Çömlekoğlu EM; Dündar-Çömlekoğlu M; Özcan M; Güngör MA
J Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 24(8):620-8. PubMed ID: 25319017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Load-bearing capacity and failure types of anterior zirconia crowns veneered with overpressing and layering techniques.
Stawarczyk B; Ozcan M; Roos M; Trottmann A; Sailer I; Hämmerle CH
Dent Mater; 2011 Oct; 27(10):1045-53. PubMed ID: 21820726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses.
Anusavice KJ
Dent Mater; 2012 Jan; 28(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 22192254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
