167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36707775)
1. Detecting genomic deletions from high-throughput sequence data with unsupervised learning.
Li X; Wu Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 23(Suppl 8):568. PubMed ID: 36707775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated filtering of genome-wide large deletions through an ensemble deep learning framework.
Hu Y; Mangal S; Zhang L; Zhou X
Methods; 2022 Oct; 206():77-86. PubMed ID: 36038049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MAMnet: detecting and genotyping deletions and insertions based on long reads and a deep learning approach.
Ding H; Luo J
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Sep; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 35580841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An improved approach for accurate and efficient calling of structural variations with low-coverage sequence data.
Zhang J; Wang J; Wu Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Apr; 13 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S6. PubMed ID: 22537045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DeepSV: accurate calling of genomic deletions from high-throughput sequencing data using deep convolutional neural network.
Cai L; Wu Y; Gao J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):665. PubMed ID: 31830921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. BreakNet: detecting deletions using long reads and a deep learning approach.
Luo J; Ding H; Shen J; Zhai H; Wu Z; Yan C; Luo H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Dec; 22(1):577. PubMed ID: 34856923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dysgu: efficient structural variant calling using short or long reads.
Cleal K; Baird DM
Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 May; 50(9):e53. PubMed ID: 35100420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A recurrence-based approach for validating structural variation using long-read sequencing technology.
Zhao X; Weber AM; Mills RE
Gigascience; 2017 Aug; 6(8):1-9. PubMed ID: 28873962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. GASOLINE: detecting germline and somatic structural variants from long-reads data.
Magi A; Mattei G; Mingrino A; Caprioli C; Ronchini C; Frigè G; Semeraro R; Baragli M; Bolognini D; Colombo E; Mazzarella L; Pelicci PG
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20817. PubMed ID: 38012350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SVmine improves structural variation detection by integrative mining of predictions from multiple algorithms.
Xia Y; Liu Y; Deng M; Xi R
Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 33(21):3348-3354. PubMed ID: 29036467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SVsearcher: A more accurate structural variation detection method in long read data.
Zheng Y; Shang X; Sung WK
Comput Biol Med; 2023 May; 158():106843. PubMed ID: 37019014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toolkit for automated and rapid discovery of structural variants.
Soylev A; Kockan C; Hormozdiari F; Alkan C
Methods; 2017 Oct; 129():3-7. PubMed ID: 28583483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PRISM: pair-read informed split-read mapping for base-pair level detection of insertion, deletion and structural variants.
Jiang Y; Wang Y; Brudno M
Bioinformatics; 2012 Oct; 28(20):2576-83. PubMed ID: 22851530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Seeksv: an accurate tool for somatic structural variation and virus integration detection.
Liang Y; Qiu K; Liao B; Zhu W; Huang X; Li L; Chen X; Li K
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):184-191. PubMed ID: 27634948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. RAPTR-SV: a hybrid method for the detection of structural variants.
Bickhart DM; Hutchison JL; Xu L; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Reecy JM; Schroeder S; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Liu GE
Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(13):2084-90. PubMed ID: 25686638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of structural variants detected by PacBio-CLR and ONT sequencing in pear.
Liu Y; Zhang M; Wang R; Li B; Jiang Y; Sun M; Chang Y; Wu J
BMC Genomics; 2022 Dec; 23(1):830. PubMed ID: 36517766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis.
Rausch T; Zichner T; Schlattl A; Stütz AM; Benes V; Korbel JO
Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 28(18):i333-i339. PubMed ID: 22962449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gustaf: Detecting and correctly classifying SVs in the NGS twilight zone.
Trappe K; Emde AK; Ehrlich HC; Reinert K
Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 30(24):3484-90. PubMed ID: 25028727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SVM²: an improved paired-end-based tool for the detection of small genomic structural variations using high-throughput single-genome resequencing data.
Chiara M; Pesole G; Horner DS
Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Oct; 40(18):e145. PubMed ID: 22735696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. svclassify: a method to establish benchmark structural variant calls.
Parikh H; Mohiyuddin M; Lam HY; Iyer H; Chen D; Pratt M; Bartha G; Spies N; Losert W; Zook JM; Salit M
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():64. PubMed ID: 26772178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
