205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36708227)
1. Prognostic differences among the positive surgical margin locations following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a large Japanese cohort (the MSUG94 group).
Sasaki T; Ebara S; Tatenuma T; Ikehata Y; Nakayama A; Kawase M; Toide M; Yoneda T; Sakaguchi K; Teishima J; Makiyama K; Kitamura H; Saito K; Koie T; Koga F; Urakami S; Inoue T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2023 Apr; 53(5):443-451. PubMed ID: 36708227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto T; Nakashima J; Inoue R; Komori O; Yamaguchi Y; Kashima T; Satake N; Nakagami Y; Namiki K; Nagao T; Ohno Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 25(2):377-383. PubMed ID: 31673831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence and location of positive surgical margin among open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: a single institutional analysis.
Koizumi A; Narita S; Nara T; Takayama K; Kanda S; Numakura K; Tsuruta H; Maeno A; Huang M; Saito M; Inoue T; Tsuchiya N; Satoh S; Nanjo H; Habuchi T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2018 Aug; 48(8):765-770. PubMed ID: 29931077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pitfalls of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparison of positive surgical margins between robotic and laparoscopic surgery.
Tozawa K; Yasui T; Umemoto Y; Mizuno K; Okada A; Kawai N; Takahashi S; Kohri K
Int J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):976-9. PubMed ID: 24912809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical factors associated with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion followed by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective multicenter cohort study in Japan (the MSUG94 group).
Kawase M; Ebara S; Tatenuma T; Sasaki T; Ikehata Y; Nakayama A; Toide M; Yoneda T; Sakaguchi K; Teishima J; Makiyama K; Inoue T; Kitamura H; Saito K; Koga F; Urakami S; Koie T
J Robot Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 36928750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 784 Japanese patients.
Hashimoto T; Yoshioka K; Nagao G; Nakagami Y; Ohno Y; Horiguchi Y; Namiki K; Nakashima J; Tachibana M
Int J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 25339062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence free survival after radical prostatectomy with positive surgical margins].
Roux V; Eyraud R; Brureau L; Gourtaud G; Senechal C; Fofana M; Blanchet P
Prog Urol; 2017; 27(8-9):467-473. PubMed ID: 28576421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis.
Obek C; Sadek S; Lai S; Civantos F; Rubinowicz D; Soloway MS
Urology; 1999 Oct; 54(4):682-8. PubMed ID: 10510928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term oncological and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A retrospective multicenter cohort study in Japan (the MSUG94 group).
Kato D; Ebara S; Tatenuma T; Sasaki T; Ikehata Y; Nakayama A; Toide M; Yoneda T; Sakaguchi K; Teishima J; Makiyama K; Inoue T; Kitamura H; Saito K; Koga F; Urakami S; Koie T
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Oct; 15(4):745-752. PubMed ID: 35508895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Martin SK; Amling CL; Zincke H
Urology; 1997 Nov; 50(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 9372884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology.
Tan N; Shen L; Khoshnoodi P; Alcalá HE; Yu W; Hsu W; Reiter RE; Lu DY; Raman SS
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1218-1223. PubMed ID: 29128577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blood transfusion had no influence on the 5-year biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective study.
Han J; Jeon YT; Ryu JH; Oh AY; Kim H; Bae YK; Koo CH
BMC Urol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):160. PubMed ID: 34789219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reality of nerve sparing and surgical margins in surgeons' early experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan.
Tatsugami K; Yoshioka K; Shiroki R; Eto M; Yoshino Y; Tozawa K; Fukasawa S; Fujisawa M; Takenaka A; Nasu Y; Kashiwagi A; Gotoh M; Terachi T;
Int J Urol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):191-196. PubMed ID: 28122393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Variations in Prostatic Apex Shape on Apical Margin Positive Rate After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy vs Open Radical Prostatectomy.
Yu YD; Lee M; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee S
J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 29212368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive factors associated with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy for pathological T2 prostate cancer with negative surgical margins.
Aoun F; Albisinni S; Henriet B; Tombal B; Van Velthoven R; Roumeguère T
Scand J Urol; 2017 Feb; 51(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27910728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
