These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36709258)

  • 1. Correction: Impact of sampling and data collection methods on maternity survey response: a randomised controlled trial of paper and push-to-web surveys and a concurrent social media survey.
    Harrison S; Alderdice F; Quigley MA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):28. PubMed ID: 36709258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of sampling and data collection methods on maternity survey response: a randomised controlled trial of paper and push-to-web surveys and a concurrent social media survey.
    Harrison S; Alderdice F; Quigley MA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):10. PubMed ID: 36635637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correction: Impact of sampling and data collection methods on maternity survey response: a randomised controlled trial of paper and push‑to‑web surveys and a concurrent social media survey.
    Harrison S; Alderdice F; Quigley MA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Apr; 24(1):100. PubMed ID: 38684950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of a web-push vs. mailed survey protocol in the Monitoring the Future panel study among adults ages 35 to 60.
    Patrick ME; Pang YC; Terry-McElrath YM; Laetz V; Couper MP
    Drug Alcohol Depend Rep; 2022 Sep; 4():. PubMed ID: 36120182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An experimental comparison of web-push vs. paper-only survey procedures for conducting an in-depth health survey of military spouses.
    McMaster HS; LeardMann CA; Speigle S; Dillman DA;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):73. PubMed ID: 28441932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effectiveness of "Push-to-Web" as an Option for a Survey of New Mothers.
    Tumin R; Johnson K; Spence D; Oza-Frank R
    Matern Child Health J; 2020 Aug; 24(8):960-965. PubMed ID: 32350731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Use of Multimode Data Collection in Random Digit Dialing Cell Phone Surveys for Young Adults: Feasibility Study.
    Gundersen DA; Wivagg J; Young WJ; Yan T; Delnevo CD
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Dec; 23(12):e31545. PubMed ID: 34932017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies.
    Harrison S; Henderson J; Alderdice F; Quigley MA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):65. PubMed ID: 30894130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Building on a Sequential Mixed-Mode Research Design in the Monitoring the Future Study.
    Patrick ME; Couper MP; Jang BJ; Laetz V; Schulenberg JE; O'Malley PM; Bachman J; Johnston LD
    J Surv Stat Methodol; 2022 Feb; 10(1):149-160. PubMed ID: 35083357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of a web-push survey on physician survey responses rates: a randomized experiment.
    Delnevo CD; Singh B
    Surv Pract; 2021; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 33604202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient-reported experiences with general practitioners: a randomised study of mail and web-based approaches following a national survey.
    Iversen HH; Holmboe O; Bjertnaes O
    BMJ Open; 2020 Oct; 10(10):e036533. PubMed ID: 33051230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The feasibility of web surveys for obtaining patient-reported outcomes from cancer survivors: a randomized experiment comparing survey modes and brochure enclosures.
    Millar MM; Elena JW; Gallicchio L; Edwards SL; Carter ME; Herget KA; Sweeney C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):208. PubMed ID: 31730474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unit Response and Costs in Web Versus Face-To-Face Data Collection: Comparison of Two Cross-sectional Health Surveys.
    Braekman E; Demarest S; Charafeddine R; Drieskens S; Berete F; Gisle L; Van der Heyden J; Van Hal G
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e26299. PubMed ID: 34994701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spider web survey or whole plant visual sampling? Impact assessment of Bt corn on non-target predatory insects with two concurrent methods.
    Tóth F; Arpás K; Szekeres D; Kádár F; Szentkirályi F; Szénási A; Kiss J
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2004; 3(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 16028799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Search for Consumers of Web-Based Raw DNA Interpretation Services: Using Social Media to Target Hard-to-Reach Populations.
    Cahill TJ; Wertz B; Zhong Q; Parlato A; Donegan J; Forman R; Manot S; Wu T; Xu Y; Cummings JJ; Norkunas Cunningham T; Wang C
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e12980. PubMed ID: 31364607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Going web or staying paper? The use of web-surveys among older people.
    Kelfve S; Kivi M; Johansson B; Lindwall M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):252. PubMed ID: 33032531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Web-Based Data Collection for Older Adults Living With HIV in a Clinical Research Setting: Pilot Observational Study.
    Tassiopoulos K; Roberts-Toler C; Fichtenbaum CJ; Koletar SL
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Nov; 22(11):e18588. PubMed ID: 33174854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using Web-Based Surveys to Explore Equine Industry Practices and Future Research Needs.
    Jaqueth AL; Hathaway M; Catalano DN; Linders NC; Mottet R; Martinson KL
    J Equine Vet Sci; 2019 Dec; 83():102822. PubMed ID: 31791526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Different Recruitment Methods: Longitudinal, Web-Based, Pan-European Physical Activity Through Sustainable Transport Approaches (PASTA) Project.
    Gaupp-Berghausen M; Raser E; Anaya-Boig E; Avila-Palencia I; de Nazelle A; Dons E; Franzen H; Gerike R; Götschi T; Iacorossi F; Hössinger R; Nieuwenhuijsen M; Rojas-Rueda D; Sanchez J; Smeds E; Deforth M; Standaert A; Stigell E; Cole-Hunter T; Int Panis L
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(5):e11492. PubMed ID: 31066715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mixed-mode versus paper surveys for patient-reported outcomes after critical illness: A randomised controlled trial.
    Wong HZ; Brusseleers M; Hall KA; Maiden MJ; Chapple LS; Chapman MJ; Hodgson CL; Gluck S
    Aust Crit Care; 2022 May; 35(3):286-293. PubMed ID: 34176735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.