BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36709292)

  • 1. Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective study based on 452 patients.
    Lu M; Luo Y; Wang Y; Yu J; Zheng H; Yang Z
    BMC Urol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):11. PubMed ID: 36709292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
    Fabiani A; Principi E; Filosa A; Servi L
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Oct; 89(3):245-246. PubMed ID: 28969413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A retrospective comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
    Di Franco CA; Jallous H; Porru D; Giliberto GL; Cebrelli T; Tinelli C; Rovereto B
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Mar; 89(1):55-59. PubMed ID: 28403597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A noninferiority within-person study comparing the accuracy of transperineal to transrectal MRI-US fusion biopsy for prostate-cancer detection.
    Ber Y; Segal N; Tamir S; Benjaminov O; Yakimov M; Sela S; Halstauch D; Baniel J; Kedar D; Margel D
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Sep; 23(3):449-456. PubMed ID: 31953483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct comparison between transrectal and transperineal extended prostate biopsy for the detection of cancer.
    Kawakami S; Yamamoto S; Numao N; Ishikawa Y; Kihara K; Fukui I
    Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):719-24. PubMed ID: 17681062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shen PF; Zhu YC; Wei WR; Li YZ; Yang J; Li YT; Li DM; Wang J; Zeng H
    Asian J Androl; 2012 Mar; 14(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 22101942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy on the Risk of Upgrading in Final Pathology in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy? An European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study.
    Zattoni F; Marra G; Martini A; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Harkin T; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Marquis A; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Morlacco A; Kretschmer A; Barletta F; Heidegger I; Tilki D; van den Bergh R; Dal Moro F; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Novara G; Gandaglia G;
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):621-628. PubMed ID: 36746729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How many cores are enough? Optimizing the transperineal prostate biopsy template.
    Schaufler C; Daigle R; Singhaviranon S; Gjertson CK; Albertsen PC; Ristau BT
    Urol Oncol; 2022 May; 40(5):191.e1-191.e7. PubMed ID: 35067430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of cancer detection rate and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy approaches - a single center preliminary study.
    Huang GL; Kang CH; Lee WC; Chiang PH
    BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 31660936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transrectal versus transperineal 14-core prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a comparative evaluation at the same institution.
    Cerruto MA; Vianello F; D'Elia C; Artibani W; Novella G
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2014 Dec; 86(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 25641452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches.
    Tewes S; Peters I; Tiemeyer A; Peperhove M; Hartung D; Pertschy S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Hueper K
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():2176471. PubMed ID: 29094042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy for detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
    Xue J; Qin Z; Cai H; Zhang C; Li X; Xu W; Wang J; Xu Z; Yu B; Xu T; Zou Q
    Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(14):23322-23336. PubMed ID: 28177897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the complications of traditional 12 cores transrectal prostate biopsy with image fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy.
    Huang H; Wang W; Lin T; Zhang Q; Zhao X; Lian H; Guo H
    BMC Urol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):68. PubMed ID: 27855661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of extraprostatic extension by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted combined with systemic template prostate biopsy.
    Chuang HW; Wu S; Lin SX; Zhao T; Kim MM; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Dahl DM; Wu CL
    Diagn Pathol; 2023 Sep; 18(1):101. PubMed ID: 37697349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Detection of Prostate Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Prostate Biopsies is Superior with the Transperineal vs the Transrectal Approach. A European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-Institutional Study.
    Zattoni F; Marra G; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Nandurkar R; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Barletta F; Leni R; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Hanegbi U; Landaumailto A; Snow R; Apfelbeck M; Kretschmer A; van den Bergh R; Novara G; Briganti A; Dal Moro F; Gandaglia G
    J Urol; 2022 Oct; 208(4):830-837. PubMed ID: 36082555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Targeted Biopsy With Use of Electromagnetically-tracked MR/US Fusion Guidance Platform for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Winoker JS; Wajswol E; Falagario U; Maritini A; Moshier E; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
    Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():278-286. PubMed ID: 32956688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical implementation of pre-biopsy magnetic resonance imaging pathways for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
    Israël B; Immerzeel J; van der Leest M; Hannink G; Zámecnik P; Bomers J; Schoots IG; van Basten JP; Debruyne F; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Barentsz J
    BJU Int; 2022 Apr; 129(4):480-490. PubMed ID: 34358388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of freehand MRI/US cognitive fusion transperineal biopsy of the prostate in local anaesthesia as in-office procedure-experience with 400 patients.
    Wetterauer C; Shahin O; Federer-Gsponer JR; Keller N; Wyler S; Seifert HH; Kwiatkowski M
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Sep; 23(3):429-434. PubMed ID: 31896767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transitioning from transrectal to transperineal prostate biopsy using a freehand cognitive approach.
    Honoré A; Moen CA; Juliebø-Jones P; Reisaeter LAR; Gravdal K; Chaudhry AA; Rawal R; Sandøy A; Beisland C
    BJU Int; 2024 Mar; 133(3):324-331. PubMed ID: 38009392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.