172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36709556)
21. Effects of acetabular resurfacing component material and fixation on the strain distribution in the pelvis.
Thompson MS; Northmore-Ball MD; Tanner KE
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2002; 216(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 12206520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The number of screws, bone quality, and friction coefficient affect acetabular cup stability.
Hsu JT; Chang CH; Huang HL; Zobitz ME; Chen WP; Lai KA; An KN
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Dec; 29(10):1089-95. PubMed ID: 17194616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Analysis of bone-prosthesis interface micromotion for cementless tibial prosthesis fixation and the influence of loading conditions.
Chong DY; Hansen UN; Amis AA
J Biomech; 2010 Apr; 43(6):1074-80. PubMed ID: 20189576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Computationally efficient prediction of bone-implant interface micromotion of a cementless tibial tray during gait.
Fitzpatrick CK; Hemelaar P; Taylor M
J Biomech; 2014 May; 47(7):1718-26. PubMed ID: 24642351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pelvic muscle and acetabular contact forces during gait.
Pedersen DR; Brand RA; Davy DT
J Biomech; 1997 Sep; 30(9):959-65. PubMed ID: 9302620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optimized design for a novel acetabular component with three wings. A study of finite element analysis.
Ma W; Zhang X; Wang J; Zhang Q; Chen W; Zhang Y
J Surg Res; 2013 Jan; 179(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 22995660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The relation between micromotion and screw fixation in acetabular cup.
Hsu JT; Lai KA; Chen Q; Zobitz ME; Huang HL; An KN; Chang CH
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Oct; 84(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 16971018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Corroboration of coupled musculoskeletal model and finite element predictions with in vivo RSA migration of an uncemented acetabular component.
Fallahnezhad K; Callary SA; O'Rourke D; Bahl JS; Thewlis D; Solomon LB; Taylor M
J Orthop Res; 2024 Feb; 42(2):373-384. PubMed ID: 37526382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Finite element study of the acetabulum in cemented hip arthroplasty investigating retention or removal of the subchondral bone plate.
Tanner KE; Svensson I; Samuelsson F; Flivik G
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2016 Oct; 61(5):525-536. PubMed ID: 26630687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bone remodelling around cementless composite acetabular components: the effects of implant geometry and implant-bone interfacial conditions.
Ghosh R; Gupta S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():257-269. PubMed ID: 24508712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of geometry and abduction angle on the stresses in cemented UHMWPE acetabular cups--finite element simulations and experimental tests.
Korhonen RK; Koistinen A; Konttinen YT; Santavirta SS; Lappalainen R
Biomed Eng Online; 2005 May; 4():32. PubMed ID: 15904521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Subject specific finite element analysis of implant stability for a cementless femoral stem.
Pettersen SH; Wik TS; Skallerud B
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jul; 24(6):480-7. PubMed ID: 19368993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of dynamic hip motion on the micromotion of press-fit acetabular cups in six degrees of freedom.
Crosnier EA; Keogh PS; Miles AW
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Aug; 38(8):717-24. PubMed ID: 27210567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prediction of micromotion initiation of an implanted femur under physiological loads and constraints using the finite element method.
Andreaus U; Colloca M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jul; 223(5):589-605. PubMed ID: 19623912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validation of FE micromotions and strains around a press-fit cup: introducing a new micromotion measuring technique.
Clarke SG; Phillips AT; Bull AM
Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Jul; 40(7):1586-96. PubMed ID: 22350664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of novel polyethylene insert configurations on bone-implant micromotion and contact stresses in total ankle replacement prostheses: a finite element analysis.
Xu Z; Gong X; Hu Z; Bian R; Jin Y; Li Y
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1371851. PubMed ID: 38699432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Total hip arthroplasty using a three-dimensional porous titanium acetabular cup: an examination of micromotion using subject-specific finite element analysis.
Miyagawa T; Matsumoto K; Komura S; Akiyama H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Mar; 22(1):308. PubMed ID: 33771146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Contribution to the study of pelvic stress during weight-bearing. Role of the pubic branch and trabecular bone].
Fabeck L; Descamps PY; Bourgois R; Dhem A
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1994; 80(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 7899636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
