These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36709556)

  • 41. Acetabular cup stiffness and implant orientation change acetabular loading patterns.
    Small SR; Berend ME; Howard LA; Tunç D; Buckley CA; Ritter MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Feb; 28(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 22854350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Influence of sidewall retention and interference fit in total ankle replacement on implant-bone micromotion: A finite element study.
    Johnson JE; Clarke GA; de Cesar Netto C; Anderson DD
    J Orthop Res; 2024 Jul; 42(7):1536-1544. PubMed ID: 38327023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bone remodelling around uncemented metallic and ceramic acetabular components.
    Ghosh R; Mukherjee K; Gupta S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 May; 227(5):490-502. PubMed ID: 23637259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Analysis of contact mechanics in McKee-farrar metal-on-metal hip implants.
    Yew A; Jagatia M; Ensaff H; Jin ZM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(5):333-40. PubMed ID: 14558645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Determinants of the primary stability of cementless acetabular cup implants: A 3D finite element study.
    Immel K; Nguyen VH; Dubory A; Flouzat-Lachaniette CH; Sauer RA; Haïat G
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Aug; 135():104607. PubMed ID: 34242871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A convenient approach for finite-element-analyses of orthopaedic implants in bone contact: modeling and experimental validation.
    Kluess D; Souffrant R; Mittelmeier W; Wree A; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jul; 95(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 19231021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of collars on the primary stability of cementless femoral stems: A finite element study using a diverse patient cohort.
    Al-Dirini RMA; Huff D; Zhang J; Besier T; Clement JG; Taylor M
    J Orthop Res; 2018 Apr; 36(4):1185-1195. PubMed ID: 28940776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Two Different Methods to Measure the Stability of Acetabular Implants: A Comparison Using Artificial Acetabular Models.
    Goossens Q; Pastrav LC; Mulier M; Desmet W; Vander Sloten J; Denis K
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jan; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 31906330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A finite element study on the mechanical response of the head-neck interface of hip implants under realistic forces and moments of daily activities: Part 1, level walking.
    Farhoudi H; Fallahnezhad K; Oskouei RH; Taylor M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Nov; 75():470-476. PubMed ID: 28823901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Three-fin acetabular prosthesis for superior acetabular bone defects: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liu YZ; Hai Y; Zhao H
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Mar; 125(5):901-5. PubMed ID: 22490594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of motion patterns on edge-loading of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
    Mellon SJ; Kwon YM; Glyn-Jones S; Murray DW; Gill HS
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Dec; 33(10):1212-20. PubMed ID: 21705257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. FE analysis of the effects of simplifications in experimental testing on micromotions of uncemented femoral knee implants.
    Berahmani S; Janssen D; Wolfson D; de Waal Malefijt M; Fitzpatrick CK; Rullkoetter PJ; Verdonschot N
    J Orthop Res; 2016 May; 34(5):812-9. PubMed ID: 26488795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Numerical comparative study of five currently used implants for high tibial osteotomy: realistic loading including muscle forces versus simplified experimental loading.
    Diffo Kaze A; Maas S; Kedziora S; Belsey J; Haupert A; Wolf C; Hoffmann A; Pape D
    J Exp Orthop; 2018 Aug; 5(1):28. PubMed ID: 30091026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Contact surface and pressure load at implant-bone interface in press-fit cups compared to natural hip joints].
    Widmer KH; Zurfluh B; Morscher EW
    Orthopade; 1997 Feb; 26(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 9157358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Validation and sensitivity of model-predicted proximal tibial displacement and tray micromotion in cementless total knee arthroplasty under physiological loading conditions.
    Yang H; Bayoglu R; Renani MS; Behnam Y; Navacchia A; Clary C; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Sep; 109():103793. PubMed ID: 32347217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Experimental validation of numerically predicted strain and micromotion in intact and implanted composite hemi-pelvises.
    Ghosh R; Gupta S; Dickinson A; Browne M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Feb; 227(2):162-74. PubMed ID: 23513987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Biomechanical analysis and clinical observation of 3D-printed acetabular prosthesis for the acetabular reconstruction of total hip arthroplasty in Crowe III hip dysplasia.
    Liu Y; Wang F; Ying J; Xu M; Wei Y; Li J; Xie H; Zhao D; Cheng L
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1219745. PubMed ID: 37790252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluating the primary stability of standard vs lateralised cementless femoral stems - A finite element study using a diverse patient cohort.
    Al-Dirini RMA; Martelli S; Huff D; Zhang J; Clement JG; Besier T; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Nov; 59():101-109. PubMed ID: 30219523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A novel method to assess primary stability of press-fit acetabular cups.
    Crosnier EA; Keogh PS; Miles AW
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Nov; 228(11):1126-34. PubMed ID: 25384445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A finite element model of the lower limb during stance phase of gait cycle including the muscle forces.
    Diffo Kaze A; Maas S; Arnoux PJ; Wolf C; Pape D
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Dec; 16(1):138. PubMed ID: 29212516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.