These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3671033)

  • 1. Spatial frequency and selective attention to spatial location.
    Shulman GL; Wilson J
    Perception; 1987; 16(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 3671033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a selective attention task.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Avella C
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9220094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial nonuniformities in visual search.
    Efron R; Yund EW
    Brain Cogn; 1996 Aug; 31(3):331-68. PubMed ID: 8812014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemifield differences in perceived spatial frequency.
    Edgar GK; Smith AT
    Perception; 1990; 19(6):759-66. PubMed ID: 2130373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial frequency and selective attention to local and global information.
    Shulman GL; Wilson J
    Perception; 1987; 16(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 3671045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective attention to spatial frequency gratings affects visual processing as early as 60 msec. poststimulus.
    Zani A; Proverbio AM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Aug; 109(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 19831095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatio-temporal discrimination of frequency in the right and left visual fields: a preliminary report.
    Rao SM; Rourke D; Whitman RD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Aug; 53(1):311-6. PubMed ID: 7290879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies.
    Kitterle FL; Christman S; Hellige JB
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 2243753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of spatial-frequency specific adaptation and target duration on visual persistence.
    Meyer GE; Maguire WM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Feb; 7(1):151-6. PubMed ID: 6452492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detectability as a function of target location: effects of spatial configuration.
    Efron R; Yund EW; Nichols DR
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Jan; 12(1):102-16. PubMed ID: 2297428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial frequencies and the cerebral hemispheres: contrast sensitivity, visible persistence, and letter classification.
    Peterzell DH; Harvey LO; Hardyck CD
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Nov; 46(5):443-55. PubMed ID: 2813029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of temporal modulation and spatial location on the perceived spatial frequency of visual patterns.
    Marran L; Davis ET
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 May; 47(5):449-56. PubMed ID: 2349057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual field effects in the discrimination of sine-wave gratings.
    Kitterle FL; Selig LM
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jul; 50(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 1881762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On Why Objects Appear Smaller in the Visual Periphery.
    Kirsch W; Pfister R; Kunde W
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Jan; 31(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 31829781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reaction times to different spatial frequencies as a function of detectability.
    Gish K; Shulman GL; Sheehy JB; Leibowitz HW
    Vision Res; 1986; 26(5):745-7. PubMed ID: 3750854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Location errors in tachistoscopic recognition: guesses, probe errors, or spatial confusions?
    Butler BE; Mewhort DJ; Tramer SC
    Can J Psychol; 1987 Sep; 41(3):339-50. PubMed ID: 3502904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective adaptation to low spatial frequencies does not decrease the Mueller-Lyer illusion.
    Larsen JD; Goldstein BA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Feb; 78(1):339-47. PubMed ID: 8177683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Serial processing of visual spatial patterns in a search paradigm.
    Efron R; Yund EW; Nichols DR
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Jan; 12(1):17-41. PubMed ID: 2297433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual field differences in spatial frequency discrimination.
    Niebauer CL; Christman SD
    Brain Cogn; 1999 Dec; 41(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 10585243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of spatial order in extrafoveal vision.
    Saarinen J
    Scand J Psychol; 1988; 29(3-4):162-7. PubMed ID: 3232039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.