These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3671049)

  • 1. Maximum-likelihood psychometric procedures in two-alternative forced-choice: evaluation and recommendations.
    Madigan R; Williams D
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Sep; 42(3):240-9. PubMed ID: 3671049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive psychophysical procedures, loss functions, and entropy.
    Kelareva E; Mewing J; Turpin A; Wirth A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):2003-12. PubMed ID: 20952796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A computer program for Spearman-Kärber and probit analysis of psychometric function data.
    Miller J; Ulrich R
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Feb; 36(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 15190695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive threshold estimation with unforced-choice tasks.
    Kaernbach C
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1377-88. PubMed ID: 11800463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observations on a maximum likelihood method of sequential threshold estimation and a simplified approximation.
    Emerson PL
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Aug; 36(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 6514529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determining thresholds using adaptive procedures and psychometric fits: evaluating efficiency using theory, simulations, and human experiments.
    Karmali F; Chaudhuri SE; Yi Y; Merfeld DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):773-89. PubMed ID: 26645306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers.
    Jäkel F; Wichmann FA
    J Vis; 2006 Nov; 6(11):1307-22. PubMed ID: 17209737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical performance of optimal Bayesian adaptive estimation.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2009 May; 12(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 19476214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: the Spearman-Kärber method.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Apr; 66(3):517-33. PubMed ID: 15283075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary.
    Klein SA
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1421-55. PubMed ID: 11800466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Order effects in two-alternative forced-choice tasks invalidate adaptive threshold estimates.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Oct; 52(5):2168-2187. PubMed ID: 32232736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold.
    Kontsevich LL; Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 1999 Aug; 39(16):2729-37. PubMed ID: 10492833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance metrics for an application-driven selection and optimization of psychophysical sampling procedures.
    Rinderknecht MD; Lambercy O; Gassert R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207217. PubMed ID: 30485350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using 10AFC to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method.
    Hou F; Lesmes L; Bex P; Dorr M; Lu ZL
    J Vis; 2015; 15(9):2. PubMed ID: 26161631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of optimal data placement for psychometric function estimation: a computer simulation.
    Lam CF; Dubno JR; Mills JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1969-76. PubMed ID: 10530021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: implications of probit analysis.
    McKee SP; Klein SA; Teller DY
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Apr; 37(4):286-98. PubMed ID: 4034345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures.
    Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jun; 87(6):2662-74. PubMed ID: 2373801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using psychophysics to ask if the brain samples or maximizes.
    Acuna DE; Berniker M; Fernandes HL; Kording KP
    J Vis; 2015 Mar; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 25767093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximum-likelihood procedures and the inattentive observer.
    Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3749-60. PubMed ID: 7790653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Properties of some variants of adaptive staircases with fixed step sizes.
    García-Pérez MA
    Spat Vis; 2002; 15(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 12116992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.