These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3671049)

  • 21. PEST reduces bias in forced choice psychophysics.
    Taylor MM; Forbes SM; Creelman CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Nov; 74(5):1367-74. PubMed ID: 6643848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identifying steep psychometric function slope quickly in clinical applications.
    Turpin A; Jankovic D; McKendrick A
    Vision Res; 2010 Nov; 50(23):2476-85. PubMed ID: 20801144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation.
    King-Smith PE; Grigsby SS; Vingrys AJ; Benes SC; Supowit A
    Vision Res; 1994 Apr; 34(7):885-912. PubMed ID: 8160402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-stimulus procedures in olfactory psychophysics: an experimental comparison of Thurstone-Ura and three-alternative forced-choice models of signal detection theory.
    Frijters JE
    Percept Psychophys; 1980 Nov; 28(5):390-7. PubMed ID: 7208248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The psi-marginal adaptive method: How to give nuisance parameters the attention they deserve (no more, no less).
    Prins N
    J Vis; 2013 Jun; 13(7):3. PubMed ID: 23750016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Algorithm for improving psychophysical threshold estimates by detecting sustained inattention in experiments using PEST.
    Rinderknecht MD; Ranzani R; Popp WL; Lambercy O; Gassert R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1629-1645. PubMed ID: 29748784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improvement of contrast sensitivity with practice is not compatible with a sensory threshold account.
    Solomon JA; Tyler CW
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2017 Jun; 34(6):870-880. PubMed ID: 29036070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statistical significance testing with mahalanobis distance for thresholds estimated from constant stimuli method.
    Nagai T; Hoshino T; Uchikawa K
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(2):91-124. PubMed ID: 21864453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the analysis of psychometric functions: the Spearman-Kärber method.
    Miller J; Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1399-420. PubMed ID: 11800465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The step method: a new adaptive psychophysical procedure.
    Simpson WA
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jun; 45(6):572-6. PubMed ID: 2740198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sampling plans for fitting the psychometric function.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 8(2):256-89. PubMed ID: 16255393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Painfree and accurate Bayesian estimation of psychometric functions for (potentially) overdispersed data.
    Schütt HH; Harmeling S; Macke JH; Wichmann FA
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():105-123. PubMed ID: 27013261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Additional rules for the transformed up-down method in psychophysics.
    Brown LG
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Aug; 58(6):959-62. PubMed ID: 8768190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. DLs in reminder and 2AFC tasks: data and models.
    Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1179-98. PubMed ID: 20436209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sensory thresholds obtained from MEG data: cortical psychometric functions.
    Witton C; Patel T; Furlong PL; Henning GB; Worthen SF; Talcott JB
    Neuroimage; 2012 Nov; 63(3):1249-56. PubMed ID: 22902921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.
    Watson AB; Pelli DG
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Feb; 33(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 6844102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity Development in Children: Sweep Visually Evoked Potential and Psychophysics.
    Almoqbel FM; Irving EL; Leat SJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Aug; 94(8):830-837. PubMed ID: 28737606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Principles of an adaptive method for measuring the slope of the psychometric function.
    King-Smith PE; Rose D
    Vision Res; 1997 Jun; 37(12):1595-604. PubMed ID: 9231226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rocket-ship psychophysics. Assessing visual functioning in young children.
    Abramov I; Hainline L; Turkel J; Lemerise E; Smith H; Gordon J; Petry S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1984 Nov; 25(11):1307-15. PubMed ID: 6490332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimizing reliability and sensitivity of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for establishing point tactile thresholds.
    Tracey EH; Greene AJ; Doty RL
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Feb; 105(4):982-6. PubMed ID: 22100625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.