BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36711729)

  • 1. Modulation of protein-DNA binding reveals mechanisms of spatiotemporal gene control in early
    Syed S; Duan Y; Lim B
    bioRxiv; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36711729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modulation of protein-DNA binding reveals mechanisms of spatiotemporal gene control in early
    Syed S; Duan Y; Lim B
    Elife; 2023 Nov; 12():. PubMed ID: 37934571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regulation of spatiotemporal limits of developmental gene expression via enhancer grammar.
    Keller SH; Jena SG; Yamazaki Y; Lim B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(26):15096-15103. PubMed ID: 32541043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic regulation of anterior-posterior patterning genes in living Drosophila embryos.
    Fukaya T
    Curr Biol; 2021 May; 31(10):2227-2236.e6. PubMed ID: 33761316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shadow enhancers can suppress input transcription factor noise through distinct regulatory logic.
    Waymack R; Fletcher A; Enciso G; Wunderlich Z
    Elife; 2020 Aug; 9():. PubMed ID: 32804082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential regulation of mesodermal gene expression by Drosophila cell type-specific Forkhead transcription factors.
    Zhu X; Ahmad SM; Aboukhalil A; Busser BW; Kim Y; Tansey TR; Haimovich A; Jeffries N; Bulyk ML; Michelson AM
    Development; 2012 Apr; 139(8):1457-66. PubMed ID: 22378636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transcriptional activators in the early Drosophila embryo perform different kinetic roles.
    Harden TT; Vincent BJ; DePace AH
    Cell Syst; 2023 Apr; 14(4):258-272.e4. PubMed ID: 37080162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shadow enhancers mediate trade-offs between transcriptional noise and fidelity.
    Fletcher A; Wunderlich Z; Enciso G
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 May; 19(5):e1011071. PubMed ID: 37205714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of sequence determinants of enhancer function using natural genetic variation.
    Yang MG; Ling E; Cowley CJ; Greenberg ME; Vierbuchen T
    Elife; 2022 Aug; 11():. PubMed ID: 36043696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Information content differentiates enhancers from silencers in mouse photoreceptors.
    Friedman RZ; Granas DM; Myers CA; Corbo JC; Cohen BA; White MA
    Elife; 2021 Sep; 10():. PubMed ID: 34486522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. COPS: detecting co-occurrence and spatial arrangement of transcription factor binding motifs in genome-wide datasets.
    Ha N; Polychronidou M; Lohmann I
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52055. PubMed ID: 23272209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncovering cis-regulatory sequence requirements for context-specific transcription factor binding.
    Yáñez-Cuna JO; Dinh HQ; Kvon EZ; Shlyueva D; Stark A
    Genome Res; 2012 Oct; 22(10):2018-30. PubMed ID: 22534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcription factor binding kinetics and transcriptional bursting: What do we really know?
    Mazzocca M; Colombo E; Callegari A; Mazza D
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2021 Dec; 71():239-248. PubMed ID: 34481381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probing transcription factor combinatorics in different promoter classes and in enhancers.
    Vandel J; Cassan O; Lèbre S; Lecellier CH; Bréhélin L
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Feb; 20(1):103. PubMed ID: 30709337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancer Features that Drive Formation of Transcriptional Condensates.
    Shrinivas K; Sabari BR; Coffey EL; Klein IA; Boija A; Zamudio AV; Schuijers J; Hannett NM; Sharp PA; Young RA; Chakraborty AK
    Mol Cell; 2019 Aug; 75(3):549-561.e7. PubMed ID: 31398323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
    He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive modeling reveals that higher-order cooperativity drives transcriptional repression in a synthetic developmental enhancer.
    Kim YJ; Rhee K; Liu J; Jeammet S; Turner MA; Small SJ; Garcia HG
    Elife; 2022 Dec; 11():. PubMed ID: 36503705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short DNA sequence patterns accurately identify broadly active human enhancers.
    Colbran LL; Chen L; Capra JA
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 28716036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome-wide analyses of Shavenbaby target genes reveals distinct features of enhancer organization.
    Menoret D; Santolini M; Fernandes I; Spokony R; Zanet J; Gonzalez I; Latapie Y; Ferrer P; Rouault H; White KP; Besse P; Hakim V; Aerts S; Payre F; Plaza S
    Genome Biol; 2013 Aug; 14(8):R86. PubMed ID: 23972280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic modulation of enhancer responsiveness by core promoter elements in living Drosophila embryos.
    Yokoshi M; Kawasaki K; Cambón M; Fukaya T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Jan; 50(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 34897508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.