110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36711982)
1. Deep learning prediction boosts phosphoproteomics-based discoveries through improved phosphopeptide identification.
Yi X; Wen B; Ji S; Saltzman A; Jaehnig EJ; Lei JT; Gao Q; Zhang B
bioRxiv; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36711982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deep Learning Prediction Boosts Phosphoproteomics-Based Discoveries Through Improved Phosphopeptide Identification.
Yi X; Wen B; Ji S; Saltzman AB; Jaehnig EJ; Lei JT; Gao Q; Zhang B
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2024 Feb; 23(2):100707. PubMed ID: 38154692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deep-Learning-Derived Evaluation Metrics Enable Effective Benchmarking of Computational Tools for Phosphopeptide Identification.
Jiang W; Wen B; Li K; Zeng WF; da Veiga Leprevost F; Moon J; Petyuk VA; Edwards NJ; Liu T; Nesvizhskii AI; Zhang B
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2021; 20():100171. PubMed ID: 34737085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DeepFLR facilitates false localization rate control in phosphoproteomics.
Zong Y; Wang Y; Yang Y; Zhao D; Wang X; Shen C; Qiao L
Nat Commun; 2023 Apr; 14(1):2269. PubMed ID: 37080984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unambiguous Phosphosite Localization through the Combination of Trypsin and LysargiNase Mirror Spectra in a Large-Scale Phosphoproteome Study.
Xu F; Yu L; Peng X; Zhang J; Li S; Liu S; Yin Y; An Z; Wang F; Fu Y; Xu P
J Proteome Res; 2020 Jun; 19(6):2185-2194. PubMed ID: 32388983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A New Workflow for the Analysis of Phosphosite Occupancy in Paired Samples by Integration of Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics Data Sets.
Wang Y; Tian Y; Liu X; Dong J; Wang L; Ye M
J Proteome Res; 2020 Sep; 19(9):3807-3816. PubMed ID: 32786891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PhoPepMass: A database and search tool assisting human phosphorylation peptide identification from mass spectrometry data.
Zhang M; Cui H; Chen L; Yu Y; Glocker MO; Xie L
J Genet Genomics; 2018 Jul; 45(7):381-388. PubMed ID: 30055873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Research progress and application of retention time prediction method based on deep learning].
DU Z; Shao W; Qin W
Se Pu; 2021 Mar; 39(3):211-218. PubMed ID: 34227303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fragment Mass Spectrum Prediction Facilitates Site Localization of Phosphorylation.
Yang Y; Horvatovich P; Qiao L
J Proteome Res; 2021 Jan; 20(1):634-644. PubMed ID: 32985198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phosphoproteomics with Activated Ion Electron Transfer Dissociation.
Riley NM; Hebert AS; Dürnberger G; Stanek F; Mechtler K; Westphall MS; Coon JJ
Anal Chem; 2017 Jun; 89(12):6367-6376. PubMed ID: 28383256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-Throughput Characterization of Histidine Phosphorylation Sites Using UPAX and Tandem Mass Spectrometry.
Hardman G; Eyers CE
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2077():225-235. PubMed ID: 31707662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A streamlined tandem tip-based workflow for sensitive nanoscale phosphoproteomics.
Tsai CF; Wang YT; Hsu CC; Kitata RB; Chu RK; Velickovic M; Zhao R; Williams SM; Chrisler WB; Jorgensen ML; Moore RJ; Zhu Y; Rodland KD; Smith RD; Wasserfall CH; Shi T; Liu T
Commun Biol; 2023 Jan; 6(1):70. PubMed ID: 36653408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parallel reaction monitoring on a Q Exactive mass spectrometer increases reproducibility of phosphopeptide detection in bacterial phosphoproteomics measurements.
Taumer C; Griesbaum L; Kovacevic A; Soufi B; Nalpas NC; Macek B
J Proteomics; 2018 Oct; 189():60-66. PubMed ID: 29605292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated phosphopeptide identification using multiple MS/MS fragmentation modes.
Vandenbogaert M; Hourdel V; Jardin-Mathé O; Bigeard J; Bonhomme L; Legros V; Hirt H; Schwikowski B; Pflieger D
J Proteome Res; 2012 Dec; 11(12):5695-703. PubMed ID: 23094866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved titanium dioxide enrichment of phosphopeptides from HeLa cells and high confident phosphopeptide identification by cross-validation of MS/MS and MS/MS/MS spectra.
Yu LR; Zhu Z; Chan KC; Issaq HJ; Dimitrov DS; Veenstra TD
J Proteome Res; 2007 Nov; 6(11):4150-62. PubMed ID: 17924679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehensive Evaluation of Different TiO
Li J; Wang J; Yan Y; Li N; Qing X; Tuerxun A; Guo X; Chen X; Yang F
Cells; 2022 Jun; 11(13):. PubMed ID: 35805136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confident and sensitive phosphoproteomics using combinations of collision induced dissociation and electron transfer dissociation.
Collins MO; Wright JC; Jones M; Rayner JC; Choudhary JS
J Proteomics; 2014 May; 103(100):1-14. PubMed ID: 24657495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid increases identification rate of phosphoproteomics in real biological samples.
Nakamura T; Myint KT; Oda Y
J Proteome Res; 2010 Mar; 9(3):1385-91. PubMed ID: 20099890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unambiguous phosphosite localization using electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD).
Frese CK; Zhou H; Taus T; Altelaar AF; Mechtler K; Heck AJ; Mohammed S
J Proteome Res; 2013 Mar; 12(3):1520-5. PubMed ID: 23347405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reference-facilitated phosphoproteomics: fast and reliable phosphopeptide validation by microLC-ESI-Q-TOF MS/MS.
Imanishi SY; Kochin V; Ferraris SE; de Thonel A; Pallari HM; Corthals GL; Eriksson JE
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2007 Aug; 6(8):1380-91. PubMed ID: 17510049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
