These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3671495)

  • 1. Electron dose distributions in experimental phantoms: a comparison with 2D pencil beam calculations.
    Cygler J; Battista JJ; Scrimger JW; Mah E; Antolak J
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 Sep; 32(9):1073-86. PubMed ID: 3671495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for treatment planning.
    Chamberland E; Beaulieu L; Lachance B
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):4636. PubMed ID: 26103470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electron beam dose calculations.
    Hogstrom KR; Mills MD; Almond PR
    Phys Med Biol; 1981 May; 26(3):445-59. PubMed ID: 6787621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inhomogeneity corrections in electron-beam dose planning. Limitations with the semi-infinite slab approximation.
    Lax I
    Phys Med Biol; 1986 Aug; 31(8):879-92. PubMed ID: 3763698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling skin collimation using the electron pencil beam redefinition algorithm.
    Chi PC; Hogstrom KR; Starkschall G; Antolak JA; Boyd RA
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3409-18. PubMed ID: 16370427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional electron dose calculation using an improved hybrid pencil beam model.
    Chengjun G; Zhangwen W; Zhengming L; Jette D
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 12674242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A model for calculating electron beam scattering in treatment planning.
    Werner BL; Khan FM; Deibel FC
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 6806593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calculating the angular standard deviation of electron beams using Fermi-Eyges theory.
    Keall PJ; Hoban PW
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Aug; 41(8):1511-5. PubMed ID: 8858734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test procedures for verification of an electron pencil beam algorithm implemented for treatment planning.
    Blomquist M; Karlsson M; Karlsson M
    Radiother Oncol; 1996 Jun; 39(3):271-86. PubMed ID: 8783404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The FE-lspd model for electron beam dosimetry.
    Werner BL; Cho PS; Pfund J
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Feb; 43(2):291-311. PubMed ID: 9509527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of the electron pencil beam redefinition algorithm to electron arc therapy.
    Chi PC; Hogstrom KR; Starkschall G; Boyd RA; Tucker SL; Antolak JA
    Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2369-83. PubMed ID: 16898439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pencil-beam redefinition algorithm for electron dose distributions.
    Shiu AS; Hogstrom KR
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 2008174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation of pencil kernel and depth penetration algorithms for treatment planning of proton beams.
    Russell KR; Isacsson U; Saxner M; Ahnesjö A; Montelius A; Grusell E; Dahlgren CV; Lorin S; Glimelius B
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Jan; 45(1):9-27. PubMed ID: 10661580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose properties of a laser accelerated electron beam and prospects for clinical application.
    Kainz KK; Hogstrom KR; Antolak JA; Almond PR; Bloch CD; Chiu C; Fomytskyi M; Raischel F; Downer M; Tajima T
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2053-67. PubMed ID: 15305458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic verification of a three-dimensional electron beam dose calculation algorithm.
    Cheng A; Harms WB; Gerber RL; Wong JW; Purdy JA
    Med Phys; 1996 May; 23(5):685-93. PubMed ID: 8724741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
    Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
    Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of experimental and calculated dose distributions. Electron beam dose planning at the M.D. Anderson Hospital.
    Hogstrom KR; Almond PR
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 364():89-99. PubMed ID: 6316746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The angular and energy distribution of the primary electron beam.
    Keall PJ; Hoban PW
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1994 Sep; 17(3):116-23. PubMed ID: 7980200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.