146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36715257)
1. EACH Person's Right: The Importance of Federal Abortion Care Funding to Health Care Reform.
LaRose C; Sinha MS
Am J Law Med; 2022 Jul; 48(2-3):266-274. PubMed ID: 36715257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Leveraging the Tools Available: Using the Hyde Amendment to Preserve Minimum Abortion Access and Mitigate Harms in Restrictive States.
Carrión F; Hasselbacher L; Thompson TA
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):544-548. PubMed ID: 38088618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. House vote on Hyde changes dynamic of Congressional abortion debate.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jul; (12):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs.
Vinekar K; Karlapudi A; Nathan L; Turk JK; Rible R; Steinauer J
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 35852261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protecting Health after Dobbs.
Clark BR
Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Nov; 52(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 36537270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can Congress settle the abortion issue?
Segers MC
Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.
Baron CH
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recent developments in the health care area.
Harper TD; Berg RN
J Med Assoc Ga; 1980 Sep; 69(9):785-7. PubMed ID: 7191438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's reproductive health.
Rosenfield A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jul; 169(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 8333437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.
Corns CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A consequentialist ethical analysis of federal funding of elective abortions.
Gleeson EI; Guerrini CJ
Bioethics; 2021 May; 35(4):331-336. PubMed ID: 33594696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion policy: ideology, political cleavage and the policy process.
Palley HA
Policy Stud J; 1978; 7(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 11664032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. States, Congress confront abortion services under Medicaid, health care plan.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Jan; (1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12345518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case.
Wing KR
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New York v. Sullivan.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Fed Report; 1989 Nov; 889():401-18. PubMed ID: 11648392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FOCA, funding on center stage to test new dynamic in abortion politics.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jan; (1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Barriers to abortion provision in primary care in New England, 2019-2020: A qualitative study.
Lee CM; Johns SL; Stulberg DB; Allen RH; Janiak E
Contraception; 2023 Jan; 117():39-44. PubMed ID: 35970423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
Harrison LK; Naylor KL
Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
