134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36716475)
21. Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager.
Gong X; Vedula AA; Glick SJ
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(11):2183-95. PubMed ID: 15248571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. DIMA enlargement mammography in microcalcifications: a prospective study with ROC analysis.
Grunert JH; Barbey M; Berndt G; Borchert B; Farber A; Gmelin E; Ratmann R; Rautmann B
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 11218029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Characterization of photon-counting multislit breast tomosynthesis.
Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 29159881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Microcalcification detectability in breast CT images using CNN observers.
Lyu SH; Abbey CK; Hernandez AM; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):933-945. PubMed ID: 38154070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Monte-Carlo study of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography with cadmium telluride photon-counting x-ray detectors.
Day JA; Tanguay J
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2479-2498. PubMed ID: 37967277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Image-based spectral distortion correction for photon-counting x-ray detectors.
Ding H; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1864-76. PubMed ID: 22482608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Discrimination analysis of breast calcifications using x-ray dark-field radiography.
Rauch T; Rieger J; Pelzer G; Horn F; Erber R; Wunderle M; Emons J; Nabieva N; Fuhrich N; Michel T; Hartmann A; Fasching PA; Anton G
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1813-1826. PubMed ID: 31977070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Technical feasibility proof for high-resolution low-dose photon-counting CT of the breast.
Kalender WA; Kolditz D; Steiding C; Ruth V; Lück F; Rößler AC; Wenkel E
Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1081-1086. PubMed ID: 27306559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterization of Breast Microcalcifications Using a New Ultrasound Image-Processing Technique.
Machado P; Eisenbrey JR; Stanczak M; Cavanaugh BC; Zorn LM; Forsberg F
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Jul; 38(7):1733-1738. PubMed ID: 30426546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography.
Kimme-Smith C; Haus AG; DeBruhl N; Bassett LW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):775-8. PubMed ID: 9057533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of artificial neural networks (computer analysis) in the diagnosis of microcalcifications on mammography.
Markopoulos C; Kouskos E; Koufopoulos K; Kyriakou V; Gogas J
Eur J Radiol; 2001 Jul; 39(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11439232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Characteristic performance evaluation of a photon counting Si strip detector for low dose spectral breast CT imaging.
Cho HM; Barber WC; Ding H; Iwanczyk JS; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091903. PubMed ID: 25186390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of the x-ray attenuation properties of breast calcifications, aluminium, hydroxyapatite and calcium oxalate.
Warren LM; Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Young KC
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(7):N103-13. PubMed ID: 23470559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of diagnostic performances in the evaluation of breast microcalcifications: synthetic mammography versus full-field digital mammography.
Kilic P; Sendur HN; Gultekin S; Gultekin II; Cindil E; Cerit M
Ir J Med Sci; 2022 Aug; 191(4):1891-1897. PubMed ID: 34472041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An improved method for simulating microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Zanca F; Chakraborty DP; Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Claus F; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):4012-8. PubMed ID: 18841852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Monochromatic mammography using scanning multilayer X-ray mirrors.
Windt DL
Rev Sci Instrum; 2018 Aug; 89(8):083702. PubMed ID: 30184654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Performance of 2D Synthetic Mammography Versus Digital Mammography in the Detection of Microcalcifications at Screening.
Dodelzon K; Simon K; Dou E; Levy AD; Michaels AY; Askin G; Katzen JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 32255687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Using convolutional neural networks to discriminate between cysts and masses in Monte Carlo-simulated dual-energy mammography.
Makeev A; Toner B; Qian M; Badal A; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4648-4655. PubMed ID: 34050965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
