These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36716716)

  • 1. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
    Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX: a Portuguese multicenter study.
    Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
    Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
    Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-Step Strategy for Optimizing the Preoperative Classification of Adnexal Masses in a University Hospital, Using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Models: Simple Rules and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model.
    Esquivel Villabona AL; Rodríguez JN; Ayala N; Buriticá C; Gómez AC; Velandia AM; Rodríguez N; Alcázar JL
    J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Feb; 41(2):471-482. PubMed ID: 33890698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules Risks, ADNEX Model, Subjective Assessment Compared to CA125 and HE4 with ROMA Algorithm in Discriminating between Benign, Borderline and Stage I Malignant Adnexal Lesions.
    Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smolen A; Łoziński T; Guzik P; Kluz T
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 36900029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.
    Yoeli-Bik R; Longman RE; Wroblewski K; Weigert M; Abramowicz JS; Lengyel E
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training.
    Sayasneh A; Wynants L; Preisler J; Kaijser J; Johnson S; Stalder C; Husicka R; Abdallah Y; Raslan F; Drought A; Smith AA; Ghaem-Maghami S; Epstein E; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Br J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 108(12):2448-54. PubMed ID: 23674083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Menopausal status, ultrasound and biomarker tests in combination for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in symptomatic women.
    Davenport C; Rai N; Sharma P; Deeks JJ; Berhane S; Mallett S; Saha P; Champaneria R; Bayliss SE; Snell KI; Sundar S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Jul; 7(7):CD011964. PubMed ID: 35879201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
    Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective comparative trial comparing O-RADS, IOTA ADNEX model, and RMI score for preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses for prediction of ovarian cancer.
    Poonyakanok V; Tanmahasamut P; Jaishuen A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 May; 49(5):1412-1417. PubMed ID: 36895122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Prospective External Validation of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules in the Hands of Level I and II Examiners.
    Knafel A; Banas T; Nocun A; Wiechec M; Jach R; Ludwin A; Kabzinska-Turek M; Pietrus M; Pitynski K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Oct; 37(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 26126150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
    Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center.
    Araujo KG; Jales RM; Pereira PN; Yoshida A; de Angelo Andrade L; Sarian LO; Derchain S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):778-783. PubMed ID: 27194129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ADNEX model to triage adnexal masses: An external validation study and comparison with the IOTA two-step strategy and subjective assessment by an experienced ultrasound operator.
    Viora E; Piovano E; Baima Poma C; Cotrino I; Castiglione A; Cavallero C; Sciarrone A; Bastonero S; Iskra L; Zola P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():207-211. PubMed ID: 32146226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: validation of O-RADS and comparison with ADNEX model, SA, and RMI.
    Wang R; Yang Z
    Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(10):799-806. PubMed ID: 36929789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study.
    Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Timmerman D; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Fruscio R; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Pascual MA; Testa AC; Ameye L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):324-334. PubMed ID: 32853459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.