221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36716792)
1. Fixation Pins Increase the Accuracy of Implant Surgery in Free-End Models: An In Vitro Study.
Chen X; Yang Z; Wang Y; Fu G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 May; 81(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 36716792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study.
Taheri Otaghsara SS; Joda T; Thieringer FM
J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104487. PubMed ID: 36948382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of crown coverage on the accuracy of static guided implant surgery in partially edentulous models: An in vitro study.
Wang ZY; Chao JR; Zheng JW; You M; Liu Y; Shen JF
J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103882. PubMed ID: 34742831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial.
Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of static computer-assisted implant placement in long span edentulous area by novice implant clinicians: A cross-sectional in vitro study comparing fully-guided, pilot-guided, and freehand implant placement protocols.
Abduo J; Lau D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):361-372. PubMed ID: 33817957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of Implant Placement Position Using Nondental Open-Source Software: An In Vitro Study.
Talmazov G; Bencharit S; Waldrop TC; Ammoun R
J Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 29(7):604-610. PubMed ID: 32495453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of the novel digital non-cross-arch surgical guides with integration of tooth undercut retention and screw-bone support for implant placement in mandibular free-end.
Wu Q; Lou Y; Sun J; Xie C; Wu J; Yu H
BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):550. PubMed ID: 38734597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of guided implant surgery obtained using 3D-printed surgical guides - An in vitro comparison of four evaluation methods.
Herstell H; Berndt S; Kühne C; Reich S
Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Jul; 25(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 35851354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the tooth position, guided sleeve height, supporting length, manufacturing methods, and resin E-modulus on the in vitro accuracy of surgical implant guides in a free-end situation.
Kessler A; Le V; Folwaczny M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Sep; 32(9):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 34218450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro analysis of the accuracy of static and robot-assisted implant surgery.
Mozer PS; Guentsch A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 May; 35(5):487-497. PubMed ID: 38189471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the accuracy of implant placement using different drilling systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study.
Sittikornpaiboon P; Arunjaroensuk S; Kaboosaya B; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 23(4):635-643. PubMed ID: 34288341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed.
Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro and in vivo accuracy of autonomous robotic vs. fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery.
He J; Zhang Q; Wang X; Fu M; Zhang H; Song L; Pu R; Jiang Z; Yang G
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):385-401. PubMed ID: 38214435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
