151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36718093)
1. Simultaneous adjustment of uncontrolled confounding, selection bias and misclassification in multiple-bias modelling.
Brendel P; Torres A; Arah OA
Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 52(4):1220-1230. PubMed ID: 36718093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does pattern mixture modelling reduce bias due to informative attrition compared to fitting a mixed effects model to the available cases or data imputed using multiple imputation?: a simulation study.
Welch CA; Sabia S; Brunner E; Kivimäki M; Shipley MJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 30157752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selection bias modeling using observed data augmented with imputed record-level probabilities.
Thompson CA; Arah OA
Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 24(10):747-53. PubMed ID: 25175700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.
Sullivan TR; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28877666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A weighting method for simultaneous adjustment for confounding and joint exposure-outcome misclassifications.
Penning de Vries BB; van Smeden M; Groenwold RH
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Feb; 30(2):473-487. PubMed ID: 32998668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.
Yu Y; Li H; Sun X; Su P; Wang T; Liu Y; Yuan Z; Liu Y; Xue F
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):177. PubMed ID: 29281984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential sensitivity of bias analysis results to incorrect assumptions of nondifferential or differential binary exposure misclassification.
Johnson CY; Flanders WD; Strickland MJ; Honein MA; Howards PP
Epidemiology; 2014 Nov; 25(6):902-9. PubMed ID: 25120106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Approaches to addressing missing values, measurement error, and confounding in epidemiologic studies.
van Smeden M; Penning de Vries BBL; Nab L; Groenwold RHH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 131():89-100. PubMed ID: 33176189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Misspecification of confounder-exposure and confounder-outcome associations leads to bias in effect estimates.
Schuster NA; Rijnhart JJM; Bosman LC; Twisk JWR; Klausch T; Heymans MW
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):11. PubMed ID: 36635655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heckman-type selection models to obtain unbiased estimates with missing measures outcome: theoretical considerations and an application to missing birth weight data.
Koné S; Bonfoh B; Dao D; Koné I; Fink G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):231. PubMed ID: 31815610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Nondifferential Exposure Misclassification on the Performance of Propensity Scores for Continuous and Binary Outcomes: A Simulation Study.
Wood ME; Chrysanthopoulou S; Nordeng HME; Lapane KL
Med Care; 2018 Aug; 56(8):e46-e53. PubMed ID: 28922298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Instrumental Variable Analyses and Selection Bias.
Canan C; Lesko C; Lau B
Epidemiology; 2017 May; 28(3):396-398. PubMed ID: 28169934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correction of bias from non-random missing longitudinal data using auxiliary information.
Wang C; Hall CB
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(6):671-9. PubMed ID: 20029935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Missing Data in Marginal Structural Models: A Plasmode Simulation Study Comparing Multiple Imputation and Inverse Probability Weighting.
Liu SH; Chrysanthopoulou SA; Chang Q; Hunnicutt JN; Lapane KL
Med Care; 2019 Mar; 57(3):237-243. PubMed ID: 30664611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selection Bias Due to Loss to Follow Up in Cohort Studies.
Howe CJ; Cole SR; Lau B; Napravnik S; Eron JJ
Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 26484424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inverse probability weighting to handle attrition in cohort studies: some guidance and a call for caution.
Metten MA; Costet N; Multigner L; Viel JF; Chauvet G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):45. PubMed ID: 35172753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. COVID-19 and the epistemology of epidemiological models at the dawn of AI.
Ellison GTH
Ann Hum Biol; 2020 Sep; 47(6):506-513. PubMed ID: 33228409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistical inference for association studies using electronic health records: handling both selection bias and outcome misclassification.
Beesley LJ; Mukherjee B
Biometrics; 2022 Mar; 78(1):214-226. PubMed ID: 33179768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
