These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36718093)

  • 21. Accounting for Misclassification and Selection Bias in Estimating Effectiveness of Self-managed Medication Abortion.
    Jayaweera RT; Bradshaw PT; Gerdts C; Egwuatu I; Grosso B; Kristianingrum I; Nmezi S; Zurbriggen R; Ahern J; Moseson H
    Epidemiology; 2023 Jan; 34(1):140-149. PubMed ID: 36455250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multiple imputation of missing covariates with non-linear effects and interactions: an evaluation of statistical methods.
    Seaman SR; Bartlett JW; White IR
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Apr; 12():46. PubMed ID: 22489953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.
    Hogan JW; Lancaster T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 14746439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bias and causal associations in observational research.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9302):248-52. PubMed ID: 11812579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of methods to estimate the survivor average causal effect in the presence of missing data: a simulation study.
    McGuinness MB; Kasza J; Karahalios A; Guymer RH; Finger RP; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):223. PubMed ID: 31795945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in a longitudinal categorical variable with restrictions on transitions over time: a simulation study.
    De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30630434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multiple-bias Sensitivity Analysis Using Bounds.
    Smith LH; Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2021 Sep; 32(5):625-634. PubMed ID: 34224471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multiple bias analysis using logistic regression: an example from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.
    Johnson CY; Howards PP; Strickland MJ; Waller DK; Flanders WD;
    Ann Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):510-514. PubMed ID: 29936049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correcting for selection bias in HIV prevalence estimates: an application of sample selection models using data from population-based HIV surveys in seven sub-Saharan African countries.
    Palma AM; Marra G; Bray R; Saito S; Awor AC; Jalloh MF; Kailembo A; Kirungi W; Mgomella GS; Njau P; Voetsch AC; Ward JA; Bärnighausen T; Harling G
    J Int AIDS Soc; 2022 Aug; 25(8):e25954. PubMed ID: 35929226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bias from self selection and loss to follow-up in prospective cohort studies.
    Biele G; Gustavson K; Czajkowski NO; Nilsen RM; Reichborn-Kjennerud T; Magnus PM; Stoltenberg C; Aase H
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 34(10):927-938. PubMed ID: 31451995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Confounding and regression adjustment in difference-in-differences studies.
    Zeldow B; Hatfield LA
    Health Serv Res; 2021 Oct; 56(5):932-941. PubMed ID: 33978956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Gestational Weight Gain and Long-term Maternal Obesity Risk: A Multiple-Bias Analysis.
    Hutchins F; Krafty R; El Khoudary SR; Catov J; Colvin A; Barinas-Mitchell E; Brooks MM
    Epidemiology; 2021 Mar; 32(2):248-258. PubMed ID: 33284167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Case studies in bias reduction and inference for electronic health record data with selection bias and phenotype misclassification.
    Beesley LJ; Mukherjee B
    Stat Med; 2022 Dec; 41(28):5501-5516. PubMed ID: 36131394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Monte Carlo Simulation Approaches for Quantitative Bias Analysis: A Tutorial.
    Banack HR; Hayes-Larson E; Mayeda ER
    Epidemiol Rev; 2022 Jan; 43(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 34664653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Non-ignorable missingness in logistic regression.
    Wang JJJ; Bartlett M; Ryan L
    Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(19):3005-3021. PubMed ID: 28574592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of a weighting approach for performing sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation.
    Rezvan PH; White IR; Lee KJ; Carlin JB; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():83. PubMed ID: 26464305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.
    Deeks JJ; Dinnes J; D'Amico R; Sowden AJ; Sakarovitch C; Song F; Petticrew M; Altman DG; ;
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(27):iii-x, 1-173. PubMed ID: 14499048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using interviewer random effects to remove selection bias from HIV prevalence estimates.
    McGovern ME; Bärnighausen T; Salomon JA; Canning D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Feb; 15():8. PubMed ID: 25656226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attrition Bias Related to Missing Outcome Data: A Longitudinal Simulation Study.
    Lewin A; Brondeel R; Benmarhnia T; Thomas F; Chaix B
    Epidemiology; 2018 Jan; 29(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 28926372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigation of the structure and magnitude of time-varying uncontrolled confounding in simulated cohort data analyzed using g-computation.
    Soohoo M; Arah OA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Dec; 52(6):1907-1913. PubMed ID: 37898996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.