162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36718696)
21. Evaluation of accuracy between extraoral Gothic arch tracing and various other methods assessing horizontal condylar guidance angle in completely edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Potdukhe SS; Iyer JM; Nadgere JB
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(4):322-334. PubMed ID: 37861609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validity and reliability of intraoral conventional tracer and intraoral digital tracer in different positions for recording horizontal jaw relation in edentulous patients.
Abbad NB; Srivastava R; Choukse V; Sharma V
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 31040550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An Efficient and Cost-Effective Technique to Construct an Intraoral Central Bearing Tracing Device.
Lin KC; Wagner SA
J Prosthodont; 2015 Aug; 24(6):511-4. PubMed ID: 25754357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Method and accuracy of determining the jaw position of repositioning splint with the aid of digital technique].
Fang SB; Yang GJ; Kang YF; Sun YC; Xie QF
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 33550339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Gothic arch tracing.
Scott M
Br Dent J; 2002 Jan; 192(2):62. PubMed ID: 11838003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A Technique for Digital Impression and Bite Registration for a Single Edentulous Arch.
Fang Y; Fang JH; Jeong SM; Choi BH
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e519-e523. PubMed ID: 29522269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Case report of a complete denture wearer in whom masticatory function improved by correcting horizontal maxillomandibular relationship].
Ohmichi H
Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Apr; 52(2):236-9. PubMed ID: 18467799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of recording edentulous jaw relations by using an optical jaw tracking system: An in vitro study.
Li W; Li L; Wang Y; Sun Y; Xie Q
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(3):302–310. PubMed ID: 33651032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Additively manufactured CAD-CAM complete dentures with intraoral scanning and cast digitization: A controlled clinical trial.
Al-Kaff FT; Al Hamad KQ
J Prosthodont; 2024 Jan; 33(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 37200587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intaglio surface trueness of milled and 3D-printed digital maxillary and mandibular dentures: A clinical study.
Lo Russo L; Guida L; Zhurakivska K; Troiano G; Chochlidakis K; Ercoli C
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 34116839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Comparative analysis of edentulous patients treated traditionally and with the use of a face-bow and Quick Master articulator].
Kubrak J
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1998; 44():237-49. PubMed ID: 9857542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative Analysis of the Reproduction Accuracy of Main Methods for Finding the Mandible Position in the Centric Relation Using Digital Research Method. Comparison between Analog-to-Digital and Digital Methods: A Preliminary Report.
Stafeev A; Ryakhovsky A; Petrov P; Chikunov S; Khizhuk A; Bykova M; Vuraki N
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(3):. PubMed ID: 32028674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Quantitative evaluation of three-dimensional reconstruction accuracy of edentulous models in centric relation].
Sun Y; Li H; Wang Y; Wang Y; Lyu P
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jun; 49(6):371-4. PubMed ID: 25199936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Functional impression and jaw registration: a single session procedure for the construction of complete dentures.
Utz KH; Müller F; Kettner N; Reppert G; Koeck B
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):554-61. PubMed ID: 15189312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Indigenous digital intraoral Gothic arch tracer.
Bhagat A; Barabde AS; Thakare A; Oswal MM
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):180-183. PubMed ID: 31040553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Trueness of intraoral scanning of edentulous arches: A comparative clinical study.
Al Hamad KQ; Al-Kaff FT
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 35997079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Recording jaw relationships in edentulous patients.
Akerly WB
Dent Clin North Am; 1996 Jan; 40(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 8635626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A clinico-radiographic study to compare and co-relate sagittal condylar guidance determined by intraoral gothic arch tracing method and panoramic radiograph in completely edentulous patients.
Shetty S; Kunta M; Shenoy K
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 29430137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predictable Technique to Register Retruded Contact Position (RCP) Using a Disposable Jaw Relation Recording Device.
Daher T; Lobel WA; Massad J; Ahuja S; Danilov ZJ
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 May; 36(5):323-329;quiz330. PubMed ID: 26053635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of the quantitative accuracy of 3D reconstruction of edentulous jaw models with jaw relation based on reference point system alignment.
Li W; Yuan F; Lv P; Wang Y; Sun Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117320. PubMed ID: 25659133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
