128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36718906)
1. A micro-computed tomography analysis of internal and marginal fits of fixed partial dentures: Effect of preparation finish line designs on monolithic zirconia and heat-pressed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate.
Elsherbini M; Sakrana AA; Amin RA; Diaa M; Özcan M; Al-Zordk W
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):90-99. PubMed ID: 36718906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique.
Rizonaki M; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P; Depla L; Boone M; De Coster PJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):890-898. PubMed ID: 33541816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of a CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Porcelain Laminate Veneer System.
Baig MR; Akbar AA; Sabti MY; Behbehani Z
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):502-511. PubMed ID: 34608712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of cervical finish line type on the marginal adaptation of zirconia ceramic crowns.
Comlekoglu M; Dundar M; Ozcan M; Gungor M; Gokce B; Artunc C
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 19830974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital assessment of marginal accuracy in ceramic crowns fabricated with different marginal finish line configurations.
Faruqi S; Ganji KK; Bandela V; Nagarajappa AK; Mohamed RN; Ahmed MA; Farhan M; Alwakid WN; Al-Hammad KAS; Alam MK
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jul; 34(5):789-795. PubMed ID: 34668306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture rate of 188695 lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic restorations after up to 7.5 years of clinical service: A dental laboratory survey.
Sulaiman TA; Abdulmajeed AA; Delgado A; Donovan TE
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):807-810. PubMed ID: 31703926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of Presintered Co-Cr and Zirconia Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Compared to Cast Co-Cr.
Daou EE; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):792-799. PubMed ID: 32334442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a CAD/CAM zirconia-based ceramic crown system.
Baig MR; Al-Tarakemah Y; Kasim NHA; Omar R
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(3):319–329. PubMed ID: 33616567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An In Vitro Comparison of Zirconia and Hybrid Ceramic Crowns With Heavy Chamfer and Shoulder Finish Lines.
Yadav P; Sharma V; Paliwal J; Meena KK; Madaan R; Gurjar B
Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e33940. PubMed ID: 36819334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal and internal fit of pre-sintered Co-Cr and zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses as measured using microcomputed tomography.
Daou EE; Ounsi H; Özcan M; Al-Haj Husain N; Salameh Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):409-414. PubMed ID: 29724558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of the crown preparation margin and die type on the marginal accuracy of fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
Ayad MF
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 18264520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal Fit Evaluation of CAD/CAM All Ceramic Crowns Obtained by Two Digital Workflows: An In Vitro Study Using Micro-CT Technology.
Duqum IS; Brenes C; Mendonca G; Carneiro TAPN; Cooper LF
J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1037-1043. PubMed ID: 31621973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Finish Line Design on the Fit Accuracy of CAD/CAM Monolithic Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic-Network Fixed Dental Prostheses: An In Vitro Study.
Baig MR; Akbar AA; Embaireeg M
Polymers (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(24):. PubMed ID: 34960861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of marginal fit of Lava CAD/CAM crown-copings with two finish lines.
Re D; Cerutti F; Augusti G; Cerutti A; Augusti D
Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 25126621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
