These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3671984)

  • 1. [An attempt at objective evaluation].
    Rev Infirm; 1987 Sep; 37(14):31-3. PubMed ID: 3671984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The evaluation-notation].
    Mizrahi MR
    Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr; 1990; (109-110):30-6. PubMed ID: 2389233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Being objective about appraisal.
    McKenzie I
    Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
    Goodykoontz L
    Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance appraisal tests for staff nurses.
    Cunningham CV
    Nurs Times; 1981 May; 77(22):suppl 16: 61-3. PubMed ID: 6909815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toward a comprehensive personnel system: performance appraisal--Part IV.
    Nauright L
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Aug; 18(8):67-70, 75-7. PubMed ID: 3649657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Criterion referenced performance appraisal system: a blueprint.
    Sudela KD; Landureth L
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Mar; 18(3):54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 3645448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A better way to evaluate job performance.
    Thomas DO
    RN; 1987 Jul; 50(7):15-6. PubMed ID: 3648915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Setting standards and evaluating nursing performance with a single tool.
    Fosbinder D; Vos H
    J Nurs Adm; 1989 Oct; 19(10):23-30. PubMed ID: 2778515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Establishing a criterion-based performance appraisal for a department of nursing.
    Megel MA
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1983 Sep; 18(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 6554709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Personnel evaluation in nursing].
    Sotomayor A
    Bol Col Prof Enferm P R; 1983 Jun; 9(34):9-13. PubMed ID: 6590066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance feedback: a question of source credibility.
    Stull MK
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):17, 39. PubMed ID: 3633964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Worker assessment in practice].
    Ksykiewicz-Dorota A; Drygała M
    Pieleg Polozna; 1983; (7):12-4, 22. PubMed ID: 6557572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of the work of nurses by reckoning with the results of socialist competition].
    Khorov GV; Alekseev AV; Borovitskaia LV
    Med Sestra; 1988 Jun; 47(6):11-4. PubMed ID: 3412159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating supplemental professional nurses.
    Metzger NJ
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):54-5, 58-9, 62. PubMed ID: 2294495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Assessment of the work efficiency of nurses].
    Vedenko BG; Sushchik LP; Vedenko LB
    Med Sestra; 1985 Sep; 44(9):24-6. PubMed ID: 3853062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement technology applications in performance appraisal.
    Stalker MZ; Kornblith AB; Lewis PM; Parker R
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):12-7. PubMed ID: 3633963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance appraisal systems in health care administration.
    Wiatrowski MD; Palkon DS
    Health Care Manage Rev; 1987; 12(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 3557974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Staff evaluation.
    Swartz AJ
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1979 Feb; 36(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 420206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating clinical competency in nursing.
    Lunde KF; Durbin-Lafferty E
    Nurs Manage; 1986 Aug; 17(8):47-50. PubMed ID: 3637728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.