162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36719964)
1. A New Algorithm for Automatically Calculating Noise, Spatial Resolution, and Contrast Image Quality Metrics: Proof-of-Concept and Agreement With Subjective Scores in Phantom and Clinical Abdominal CT.
Jeukens CRLPN; Brauer MTH; Mihl C; Laupman E; Nijssen EC; Wildberger JE; Martens B; van Pul C
Invest Radiol; 2023 Sep; 58(9):649-655. PubMed ID: 36719964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT automated exposure control using a generalized detectability index.
Khobragade P; Rupcich F; Fan J; Crotty DJ; Kulkarni NM; O'Connor SD; Foley WD; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):140-151. PubMed ID: 30417403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How subjective CT image quality assessment becomes surprisingly reliable: pairwise comparisons instead of Likert scale.
Hoeijmakers EJI; Martens B; Hendriks BMF; Mihl C; Miclea RL; Backes WH; Wildberger JE; Zijta FM; Gietema HA; Nelemans PJ; Jeukens CRLPN
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jul; 34(7):4494-4503. PubMed ID: 38165429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm.
Solomon J; Lyu P; Marin D; Samei E
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3961-3971. PubMed ID: 32506661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique.
McCollough CH; Leng S; Sunnegardh J; Vrieze TJ; Yu L; Lane J; Raupach R; Stierstorfer K; Flohr T
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061904. PubMed ID: 23718595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptive nonlocal means filtering based on local noise level for CT denoising.
Li Z; Yu L; Trzasko JD; Lake DS; Blezek DJ; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH; Manduca A
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011908. PubMed ID: 24387516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models.
Einstein SA; Rong XJ; Jensen CT; Liu X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):174-178. PubMed ID: 31859454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of automatic image quality assessment in chest CT - A human cadaver study.
Franck C; De Crop A; De Roo B; Smeets P; Vergauwen M; Dewaele T; Van Borsel M; Achten E; Van Hoof T; Bacher K
Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():32-37. PubMed ID: 28410683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Application of a New Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Dose Upper Abdominal CT.
Jia Y; Zhai B; He T; Yu Y; Yu N; Duan H; Yang C; Zhang X
Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):e275-e283. PubMed ID: 30660470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective evaluation of the contrast, radiation dose and image quality of contrast-enhanced CT scans of paediatric abdomens using a low-concentration iodinated contrast agent and low tube voltage combined with 70% ASIR algorithm.
Wang X; Zhong Y; Hu L; Xue L; Shi M; Qiu H; Li J
Int J Clin Pract; 2016 Sep; 70 Suppl 9B():B16-21. PubMed ID: 27577509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose Reduction for Sinus and Temporal Bone Imaging Using Photon-Counting Detector CT With an Additional Tin Filter.
Rajendran K; Voss BA; Zhou W; Tao S; DeLone DR; Lane JI; Weaver JM; Carlson ML; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH; Leng S
Invest Radiol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 31770297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noise spatial nonuniformity and the impact of statistical image reconstruction in CT myocardial perfusion imaging.
Lauzier PT; Tang J; Speidel MA; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4079-92. PubMed ID: 22830741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of a deep learning-based CT image denoising method: Generalizability over dose, reconstruction kernel, and slice thickness.
Zeng R; Lin CY; Li Q; Jiang L; Skopec M; Fessler JA; Myers KJ
Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):836-853. PubMed ID: 34954845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alpha image reconstruction (AIR): a new iterative CT image reconstruction approach using voxel-wise alpha blending.
Hofmann C; Sawall S; Knaup M; Kachelrieß M
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061914. PubMed ID: 24877825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
