116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36720289)
21. Is contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy better than conventional fine needle biopsy? A retrospective study in a medical center.
Lai JH; Lin CC; Lin HH; Chen MJ
Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):6138-6143. PubMed ID: 35484412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of K-ras gene mutation analysis in EUS-guided FNA cytology specimens for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Fuccio L; Hassan C; Laterza L; Correale L; Pagano N; Bocus P; Fabbri C; Maimone A; Cennamo V; Repici A; Costamagna G; Bazzoli F; Larghi A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):596-608. PubMed ID: 23660563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for preoperative pancreatic solid lesions.
Fujita A; Ryozawa S; Tanisaka Y; Ogawa T; Suzuki M; Katsuda H; Tashima T; Araki R; Mizuide M
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2021 Feb; 56(2):188-192. PubMed ID: 33295211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Does ProCore Fine-Needle Biopsy Really Improve the Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Pancreatic Masses?
Delconte G; Cavalcoli F; Magarotto A; Centonze G; Bezzio C; Cattaneo L; Rausa E; Kelly ME; Bonitta G; Milione M; Enzo M
Dig Dis; 2022; 40(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 33780932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genomic profiling amplifies the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy by identifying clinically applicable druggable mutations in pancreatic cancer.
Ohyama H; Mikata R; Hirotsu Y; Amemiya K; Miura Y; Hirose S; Oyama T; Takano A; Iimuro Y; Kojima Y; Mochizuki H; Ikeda J; Kato N; Omata M
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Oct; 60():152016. PubMed ID: 35905537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition by 22-Gauge Franseen and Standard Needles for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
Ishigaki K; Nakai Y; Oyama H; Kanai S; Suzuki T; Nakamura T; Sato T; Hakuta R; Saito K; Saito T; Takahara N; Hamada T; Mizuno S; Kogure H; Tada M; Isayama H; Koike K
Gut Liver; 2020 Nov; 14(6):817-825. PubMed ID: 32457276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid mass lesions of the pancreas: A retrospective comparison study of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy.
Sweeney J; Soong L; Goyal A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 31903736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Ramesh J; Varadarajulu S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 22658389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fine-needle biopsy with 19G needle is effective in combination with endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for genomic profiling of unresectable pancreatic cancer.
Ikeda G; Hijioka S; Nagashio Y; Maruki Y; Ohba A; Hisada Y; Yoshinari M; Harai S; Kitamura H; Koga T; Murashima Y; Maehara K; Okada M; Yamashige D; Okamoto K; Hara H; Hagiwara Y; Agarie D; Takasaki T; Takeshita K; Kawasaki Y; Kondo S; Morizane C; Ueno H; Hiraoka N; Yatabe Y; Saito Y; Iwakiri K; Okusaka T
Dig Endosc; 2023 Jan; 35(1):124-133. PubMed ID: 35993898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy With or Without Rapid On-site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.
Crinò SF; Di Mitri R; Nguyen NQ; Tarantino I; de Nucci G; Deprez PH; Carrara S; Kitano M; Shami VM; Fernández-Esparrach G; Poley JW; Baldaque-Silva F; Itoi T; Manfrin E; Bernardoni L; Gabbrielli A; Conte E; Unti E; Naidu J; Ruszkiewicz A; Amata M; Liotta R; Manes G; Di Nuovo F; Borbath I; Komuta M; Lamonaca L; Rahal D; Hatamaru K; Itonaga M; Rizzatti G; Costamagna G; Inzani F; Curatolo M; Strand DS; Wang AY; Ginès À; Sendino O; Signoretti M; van Driel LMJW; Dolapcsiev K; Matsunami Y; van der Merwe S; van Malenstein H; Locatelli F; Correale L; Scarpa A; Larghi A
Gastroenterology; 2021 Sep; 161(3):899-909.e5. PubMed ID: 34116031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Randomized controlled trial comparing a conventional needle and a novel needle for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided histology of peripancreatic masses.
Lee HW; Kim KM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Mar; 100(10):e25106. PubMed ID: 33725907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Histologic Core Portions Acquired from a Core Biopsy Needle and a Conventional Needle in Solid Mass Lesions: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Lee BS; Cho CM; Jung MK; Jang JS; Bae HI
Gut Liver; 2017 Jul; 11(4):559-566. PubMed ID: 28208006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Tissue Quality Comparison Between Heparinized Wet Suction and Dry Suction in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Masses: A Randomized Crossover Study.
Lin MY; Wu CL; Su YY; Huang CJ; Chang WL; Sheu BS
Gut Liver; 2023 Mar; 17(2):318-327. PubMed ID: 36052613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison between two types of needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine aspiration biopsy of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal masses.
Alkhateeb K; Lee BB; Alatassi H; Sanders MA; Omer EM; McClave SA; Fraig M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Mar; 48(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 31850666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
