151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36720549)
41. Large loop versus straight-wire excision of the transformation zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of electrosurgical techniques.
Camargo MJ; Russomano FB; Tristão MA; Huf G; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 25516462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Risk of persistent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion after electrosurgical excisional treatment with positive margins: a meta-analysis.
Oliveira CA; Russomano FB; Gomes Júnior SC; Corrêa Fde M
Sao Paulo Med J; 2012; 130(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 22481759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Can We Reduce Overtreatment of Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions?
Bradbury M; Rabasa J; Murcia MT; Dinarès MC; Sainz A; Castellet C; Pérez-Benavente A; Gil-Moreno A; Centeno C
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2022 Jan; 26(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 34928250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia After Negative Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.
Kuroki LM; James-Nywening L; Wu N; Liu J; Powell MA; Thaker PH; Massad LS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2016 Oct; 20(4):300-6. PubMed ID: 27575575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Factors associated with human papillomavirus persistence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure in patients with cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Li F; Chen A; Shan Y; Yao Y; Lu P; Li N; Ding Z
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Apr; 50(4):639-646. PubMed ID: 38185922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. HPV DNA test and Pap smear in detection of residual and recurrent disease following loop electrosurgical excision procedure of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Sarian LO; Derchain SF; Andrade LA; Tambascia J; Morais SS; Syrjänen KJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jul; 94(1):181-6. PubMed ID: 15262139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparative analysis of transcervical resection and loop electrosurgical excision in the treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Chen M; Cai H; Chen S; Wu X; Ma X; Liu M; Chen L
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Dec; 143(3):306-312. PubMed ID: 30129038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Clinical management of patients with positive excision margin after cervical conization: analysis of 148 cases].
Wang T; Kong WM; Li BZ; Wu YM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 May; 88(19):1331-4. PubMed ID: 18956703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Cytological follow-up of women older than 50 years with high-grade cervical smear treated by large loop excision.
Das N; Sutton V; Bevan J; Brinkmann D; Woolas R
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jul; 13(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 19550214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in diagnosis of cervical pathology at Srinagarind Hospital.
Ouitrakul S; Udomthavornsuk B; Chumworathayi B; Luanratanakorn S; Supoken A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(9):2451-3. PubMed ID: 22296400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Development of a machine learning-based model for predicting positive margins in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) treatment by Cold Knife Conization(CKC): a single-center retrospective study.
Zhang L; Zheng Y; Lei L; Zhang X; Yang J; Zeng Y; Chen K
BMC Womens Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):332. PubMed ID: 38849836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Analysis of the missed diagnosis of invasive carcinoma under the microscope in HSIL diagnosed by colposcopy-guided biopsy and related influencing factors].
Qian XY; You ZX; Cao QW; Zou BB; Xing Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 53(9):613-619. PubMed ID: 30293297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Specimen Fragmentation and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cold Knife Cone Biopsy Outcomes.
Grubman J; Meinhardt SS; Nambiar A; Lea JS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jan; 24(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 31860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Loop excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cytology: correlation with colposcopic and histologic findings.
Szurkus DC; Harrison TA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 May; 188(5):1180-2. PubMed ID: 12748471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Surgical management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-infected women.
Foulot H; Heard I; Potard V; Costagliola D; Chapron C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Dec; 141(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 18760524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Long-term observational approach in women with histological diagnosis of cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: an Italian multicentric retrospective cohort study.
Ciavattini A; Serri M; Di Giuseppe J; Liverani CA; Gardella B; Papiccio M; Delli Carpini G; Morini S; Clemente N; Sopracordevole F
BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e024920. PubMed ID: 31272971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Value of second pass in loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
Kim K; Kang SB; Chung HH; Lee TS; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
J Korean Med Sci; 2009 Feb; 24(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 19270822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
Wang XI; Huang F; Zhang S
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2017 Nov; 47(6):663-667. PubMed ID: 29263039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
