BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36720615)

  • 21. Hazard Ratio Analysis of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for IA1 With LVSI-IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Identifying the Possible Contraindications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Cervical Cancer.
    Li P; Liu P; Yang Y; Wang L; Liu J; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1002. PubMed ID: 32733796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selection criteria and colpotomic approach for safe minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer.
    Kong TW; Son JH; Paek J; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):e7. PubMed ID: 31788997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficacy evaluation of vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective case series study.
    Wang H; Li D; Wang C; Wang X; Yu M; Zhang X; Li L; Zeng Q; Long Z; Zheng W; Liu G; Wang D
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 10(2):124. PubMed ID: 35282041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictive Factors of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Nanthamongkolkul K; Hanprasertpong J
    Oncol Res Treat; 2018; 41(4):194-198. PubMed ID: 29562222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer patients without adjuvant treatment: Ancillary analysis of a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028).
    Paik ES; Lim MC; Kim MH; Kim YH; Song ES; Seong SJ; Suh DH; Lee JM; Lee C; Choi CH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):547-553. PubMed ID: 31272738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of Survival Outcomes after Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
    Hwang JH; Kim BW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):971-981.e3. PubMed ID: 33321255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy on short-term clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Lv X; Ding B; Xu J; Shen Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 21(1):167. PubMed ID: 37270549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Number of Positive Pelvic Lymph Nodes and Multiple Groups of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis Influence Prognosis in Stage IA-IIB Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Liu Y; Zhao LJ; Li MZ; Li MX; Wang JL; Wei LH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Aug; 128(15):2084-9. PubMed ID: 26228223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Oncologic outcomes of early stage cervical cancer performed operation by different laparoscopic surgical procedures: analysis of clinical data from mutiple centers].
    Ling KJ; Wang YZ; Zhang H; Zhang XY; Yang JJ; Luo CY; Song B; Zhang WX; Deng L; Chen GL; Li YD; Hu QY; Chen Y; Wang X; Zhang J; Ding JX; Ren T; Kang S; Hua KQ; Xiang Y; Cheng WW; Liang ZQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):617-623. PubMed ID: 32957750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Outcome and prognostic factors of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in 148 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
    Yan X; Li G; Shang H; Lin F; Yang X; Zheng F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 22146764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
    Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Open nerve-plane sparing radical hysterectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: evaluation on efficacy and long-term survival outcomes].
    Shu T; Li B; Zhao D; Wang YT; Liu SH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 56(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 33486927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Trend in proportion and clinicopathological characteristics of young women with stage Ⅰa2 to Ⅱa2 cervical cancer].
    Wang W; Hao M; Chen CL; Liu P; Ling B; Kang S; Lu AW; Wang WL; Zhao WD; Zhu QY; Zhao YY; Zhao HW; Jin SL; Ni Y; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):666-672. PubMed ID: 31648442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Survival and prognosticators of node-positive cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy.
    Hosaka M; Watari H; Mitamura T; Konno Y; Odagiri T; Kato T; Takeda M; Sakuragi N
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 16(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 20842404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surgical and oncologic outcomes between laparoscopic and radical abdominal hysterectomy for IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Quan C; Liang S; Feng Z; Zhu J; Zhang M; Huang Y
    Asian J Surg; 2023 Jan; 46(1):105-110. PubMed ID: 35367095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vaginal Closure with EndoGIA to Prevent Tumor Spillage in Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Boyraz G; Karalok A; Basaran D; Turan T
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):602. PubMed ID: 30064005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea.
    Kim SI; Lee M; Lee S; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim YB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 155(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 31383569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative single-center study between modified laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Li X; Pei X; Li H; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Wei Z; Yin Z
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Dec; 20(1):392. PubMed ID: 36503552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.