These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3672120)

  • 1. Safety of DOE reactors questioned.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1987 Nov; 238(4828):741. PubMed ID: 3672120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nuclear reactor safety: a new dilemma for the AEC.
    Gillette R
    Science; 1971 Jul; 173(3992):126-30. PubMed ID: 5581905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The safety goals of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Okrent D
    Science; 1987 Apr; 236(4799):296-300. PubMed ID: 3563510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nuclear safety: United States opts for caution.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1986 Dec 18-31; 324(6098):607. PubMed ID: 3796725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nuclear safety: NRC investigates Seabrook.
    Collins E
    Nature; 1986 Nov 20-26; 324(6094):203. PubMed ID: 3785390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.
    Moeller DW
    Health Phys; 1975 Mar; 28(3):177-87. PubMed ID: 1112717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Government nuclear accident planning--do doctors have confidence in it?
    Morrison L
    Med War; 1989; 5(4):173-4. PubMed ID: 2622416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Yugoslavia: doubts on nuclear safety.
    Rich V
    Occup Health (Lond); 1981 Aug; 33(8):427-9. PubMed ID: 6912963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nuclear safety: damaged fuel ignites a new debate in AEC.
    Gillette R
    Science; 1972 Jul; 177(4046):330-1. PubMed ID: 5035481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to give good dogs bad names.
    Nature; 1986 Dec 18-31; 324(6098):601-2. PubMed ID: 3796720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low-dose radiation: latest data renew questions of 'safe' level.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1990 Aug; 264(5):553-4, 557. PubMed ID: 2366287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Safety systems in nuclear power plants with pressurized water reactors and demonstration of their function in technical scale experiments. II].
    Hennies HH
    Naturwissenschaften; 1987 Nov; 74(11):520-7. PubMed ID: 3431585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soviet worries about nuclear safety after Chernobyl.
    Rich V
    Nature; 1988 Aug; 334(6181):373. PubMed ID: 3405282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of health physics research administered by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Moeller DW
    Health Phys; 1978 Sep; 35(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 748242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Nuclear competition and its repercussions on the norms applicable to reactors in the United States].
    Hubert EH
    J Belge Radiol; 1974; 57(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 4600440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fallout at Three Mile Island.
    Maxon HR
    Ann Intern Med; 1979 Sep; 91(3):486-7. PubMed ID: 475179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abnormal occurrences for second quarter CY 1991; dissemination of information--Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Fed Regist; 1991 Oct; 56(200):51919-21. PubMed ID: 10115357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board's first decade.
    Chapman B
    J Gov Inf; 2000; 27(3):345-83. PubMed ID: 17886407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nuclear power and public health.
    Wolff AH
    Am J Public Health; 1972 Aug; 62(8):1042-3. PubMed ID: 5046439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Half-way report from Chernobyl.
    Nature; 1986 Jul 24-30; 322(6077):293. PubMed ID: 3736655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.