These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3672128)
21. Fraudulent research in science: the responsibility of the peer reviewer. MacDermott RP Cancer Invest; 1991; 9(6):703-5. PubMed ID: 1747796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Deceit in science: does it really matter? Birch AJ Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. When good scientists turn bad. Roman MB Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Reduce fraud in seven easy steps. Norman C Science; 1984 May; 224(4649):581. PubMed ID: 6710157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects? Garfield E Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(15):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Fraud and science. Dworkin G Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 128():65-74. PubMed ID: 6634738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. New censors in the academy: two approaches to curb their influences. Davis RD Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 11650140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Bias and fraud in medical research: a review. Pollock AV; Evans M J R Soc Med; 1985 Nov; 78(11):937-40. PubMed ID: 3906120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Should camp-followers be policemen? Maddox J Nature; 1990 Nov; 348(6297):107. PubMed ID: 1978252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. NIH panel finds no fraud in Cell paper but cites errors. Culliton BJ Science; 1988 Dec; 242(4885):1499. PubMed ID: 3201234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case. Lang S Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes. Fox MF J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. AAMC speaks on coping with fraud. Culliton BJ Science; 1982 Jul; 217(4556):226-8. PubMed ID: 7089557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy, statistics and fraud. Nature; 1987 Feb 19-25; 325(6106):656. PubMed ID: 3821859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Global trend: more science, more fraud. Altman L; Broad WJ N Y Times Web; 2005 Dec; ():F1, F6. PubMed ID: 16450465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]