These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36721300)

  • 1. Males and females contribute differently to the evolution of habitat segregation driven by hybridization.
    Kyogoku D; Yamaguchi R
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Mar; 36(3):515-528. PubMed ID: 36721300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Species coexist more easily if reinforcement is based on habitat preferences than on species recognition.
    Kyogoku D; Kokko H
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Nov; 89(11):2605-2616. PubMed ID: 32799334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reinforcement generates reproductive isolation between neighbouring conspecific populations of spadefoot toads.
    Pfennig KS; Rice AM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20140949. PubMed ID: 24990680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
    Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Females alter their mate preferences depending on hybridization risk.
    Calabrese GM; Pfennig KS
    Biol Lett; 2022 Nov; 18(11):20220310. PubMed ID: 36382373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT.
    Rundle HD; Schluter D
    Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):200-208. PubMed ID: 28568163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid female mate choice as a species isolating mechanism: environment matters.
    Schmidt EM; Pfennig KS
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):865-9. PubMed ID: 26717048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pervasive reinforcement and the role of sexual selection in biological speciation.
    Hudson EJ; Price TD
    J Hered; 2014; 105 Suppl 1():821-33. PubMed ID: 25149257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coevolution of male and female mate choice can destabilize reproductive isolation.
    Aubier TG; Kokko H; Joron M
    Nat Commun; 2019 Nov; 10(1):5122. PubMed ID: 31719522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two behavioural traits promote fine-scale species segregation and moderate hybridisation in a recovering sympatric fur seal population.
    Lancaster ML; Goldsworthy SD; Sunnucks P
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 May; 10():143. PubMed ID: 20470387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linking intra- and interspecific assortative mating: Consequences for asymmetric sexual isolation.
    Svensson EI; Nordén A; Waller JT; Runemark A
    Evolution; 2016 Jun; 70(6):1165-79. PubMed ID: 27151764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interspecific competition, hybridization, and reproductive isolation in secondary contact: missing perspectives on males and females.
    Lipshutz SE
    Curr Zool; 2018 Feb; 64(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 29492041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interspecific interactions and learning variability jointly drive geographic differences in mate preferences.
    Verzijden MN; Svensson EI
    Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1896-903. PubMed ID: 27302691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex differences in developmental plasticity and canalization shape population divergence in mate preferences.
    Svensson EI; Runemark A; Verzijden MN; Wellenreuther M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1797):. PubMed ID: 25377451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.
    Peterson MA; Honchak BM; Locke SE; Beeman TE; Mendoza J; Green J; Buckingham KJ; White MA; Monsen KJ
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2639-55. PubMed ID: 16526511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Male-driven reproductive and agonistic character displacement in darters and its implications for speciation in allopatry.
    Moran RL; Fuller RC
    Curr Zool; 2018 Feb; 64(1):101-113. PubMed ID: 29492043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymmetric reinforcement in
    St John ME; Fuller RC
    Curr Zool; 2021 Apr; 67(2):215-224. PubMed ID: 33854539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does personality affect premating isolation between locally-adapted populations?
    Sommer-Trembo C; Bierbach D; Arias-Rodriguez L; Verel Y; Jourdan J; Zimmer C; Riesch R; Streit B; Plath M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Jun; 16():138. PubMed ID: 27338278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preference for conspecifics evolves earlier in males than females in a sexually dimorphic radiation of fishes.
    Mendelson TC; Gumm JM; Martin MD; Ciccotto PJ
    Evolution; 2018 Feb; 72(2):337-347. PubMed ID: 29265367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.