These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36721799)

  • 1. Explicit and Implicit Devaluation Effects of Food-Specific Response Inhibition Training.
    Tzavella L; Chambers CD
    J Cogn; 2023; 6(1):10. PubMed ID: 36721799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do impulsive individuals benefit more from food go/no-go training? Testing the role of inhibition capacity in the no-go devaluation effect.
    Chen Z; Veling H; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    Appetite; 2018 May; 124():99-110. PubMed ID: 28442335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does not responding to appetitive stimuli cause devaluation: Evaluative conditioning or response inhibition?
    Chen Z; Veling H; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Dec; 145(12):1687-1701. PubMed ID: 27736134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of attention in explaining the no-go devaluation effect: Effects on appetitive food items.
    Quandt J; Holland RW; Chen Z; Veling H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1119-1133. PubMed ID: 31144856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring acute and non-specific effects of mobile app-based response inhibition training on food evaluation and intake.
    Moore H; White MJ; Finlayson G; King N
    Appetite; 2022 Nov; 178():106181. PubMed ID: 35870536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When not responding to food changes food value: The role of timing.
    Liu H; Holland RW; Veling H
    Appetite; 2023 Aug; 187():106583. PubMed ID: 37121485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response inhibition training as an intervention to modify liking and wanting for foods based on energy density: a proof of concept study.
    Moore H; White MJ; Finlayson G; King N
    J Behav Med; 2024 Apr; 47(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 37814036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can smartphone-based response inhibition training elicit sustained changes in appetite, preference, and cravings for energy-dense foods? A free-living randomized controlled trial.
    Moore H; White MJ; Finlayson G; King N
    Br J Health Psychol; 2024 Feb; 29(1):165-184. PubMed ID: 37704590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generalization of food devaluation following food-specific go/no-go training.
    Moshon-Cohen TE; Bitan T; Weinbach N
    Eat Behav; 2024 Aug; 54():101902. PubMed ID: 38971023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of go/no-go training on food-related action tendencies, liking and choice.
    Tzavella L; Lawrence NS; Button KS; Hart EA; Holmes NM; Houghton K; Badkar N; Macey E; Braggins AJ; Murray FC; Chambers CD; Adams RC
    R Soc Open Sci; 2021 Aug; 8(8):210666. PubMed ID: 34457346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do smokers devaluate smoking cues after go/no-go training?
    Scholten H; Granic I; Chen Z; Veling H; Luijten M
    Psychol Health; 2019 May; 34(5):609-625. PubMed ID: 30693789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Go/no-go training changes food evaluation in both morbidly obese and normal-weight individuals.
    Chen Z; Veling H; de Vries SP; Bijvank BO; Janssen IMC; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2018 Dec; 86(12):980-990. PubMed ID: 30507224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Giving pork the chop: Response inhibition training to reduce meat intake.
    Camp B; Lawrence NS
    Appetite; 2019 Oct; 141():104315. PubMed ID: 31176649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What Is Trained During Food Go/No-Go Training? A Review Focusing on Mechanisms and a Research Agenda.
    Veling H; Lawrence NS; Chen Z; van Koningsbruggen GM; Holland RW
    Curr Addict Rep; 2017; 4(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 28357193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing Go/No-Go training effects on implicit evaluations of unhealthy and healthy snack foods.
    Wittleder S; Reinelt T; Milanowski L; Viglione C; Jay M; Oettingen G
    Psychol Health; 2024 May; 39(5):573-593. PubMed ID: 35946400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Training response inhibition to reduce food consumption: Mechanisms, stimulus specificity and appropriate training protocols.
    Adams RC; Lawrence NS; Verbruggen F; Chambers CD
    Appetite; 2017 Feb; 109():11-23. PubMed ID: 27838443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Food-Specific Inhibition Training for Food Devaluation: A Meta-Analysis.
    Yang Y; Qi L; Morys F; Wu Q; Chen H
    Nutrients; 2022 Mar; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 35405975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The affective priming paradigm as an indirect measure of food attitudes and related choice behaviour.
    Tzavella L; Maizey L; Lawrence AD; Chambers CD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1397-1415. PubMed ID: 32607847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How does Go/No-Go training lead to food devaluation? Separating the effects of motor inhibition and response valence.
    Houben K
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(4):763-776. PubMed ID: 37144522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Devaluation of NoGo stimuli is both robust and fragile.
    Liu H; Holland RW; Blechert J; Quandt J; Veling H
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Aug; 36(5):876-893. PubMed ID: 35467479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.