These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36722733)

  • 1. GB-score: Minimally designed machine learning scoring function based on distance-weighted interatomic contact features.
    Rayka M; Firouzi R
    Mol Inform; 2023 Mar; 42(3):e2200135. PubMed ID: 36722733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ET-score: Improving Protein-ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Based on Distance-weighted Interatomic Contact Features Using Extremely Randomized Trees Algorithm.
    Rayka M; Karimi-Jafari MH; Firouzi R
    Mol Inform; 2021 Aug; 40(8):e2060084. PubMed ID: 34021703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delta Machine Learning to Improve Scoring-Ranking-Screening Performances of Protein-Ligand Scoring Functions.
    Yang C; Zhang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jun; 62(11):2696-2712. PubMed ID: 35579568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Small Step Toward Generalizability: Training a Machine Learning Scoring Function for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Scantlebury J; Vost L; Carbery A; Hadfield TE; Turnbull OM; Brown N; Chenthamarakshan V; Das P; Grosjean H; von Delft F; Deane CM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 May; 63(10):2960-2974. PubMed ID: 37166179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An ensemble-based approach to estimate confidence of predicted protein-ligand binding affinity values.
    Rayka M; Mirzaei M; Mohammad Latifi A
    Mol Inform; 2024 Apr; 43(4):e202300292. PubMed ID: 38358080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PharmRF: A machine-learning scoring function to identify the best protein-ligand complexes for structure-based pharmacophore screening with high enrichments.
    Kumar SP; Dixit NY; Patel CN; Rawal RM; Pandya HA
    J Comput Chem; 2022 May; 43(12):847-863. PubMed ID: 35301752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Geometric graph learning with extended atom-types features for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
    Rana MM; Nguyen DD
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Sep; 164():107250. PubMed ID: 37515872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Data Mining Meets Machine Learning: A Novel ANN-based Multi-body Interaction Docking Scoring Function (MBI-score) Based on Utilizing Frequent Geometric and Chemical Patterns of Interfacial Atoms in Native Protein-ligand Complexes.
    Khashan R; Tropsha A; Zheng W
    Mol Inform; 2022 Aug; 41(8):e2100248. PubMed ID: 35142086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sfcnn: a novel scoring function based on 3D convolutional neural network for accurate and stable protein-ligand affinity prediction.
    Wang Y; Wei Z; Xi L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):222. PubMed ID: 35676617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protein-ligand binding affinity prediction exploiting sequence constituent homology.
    Abdel-Rehim A; Orhobor O; Hang L; Ni H; King RD
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Aug; 39(8):. PubMed ID: 37572302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporating Explicit Water Molecules and Ligand Conformation Stability in Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.
    Lu J; Hou X; Wang C; Zhang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Nov; 59(11):4540-4549. PubMed ID: 31638801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AGL-Score: Algebraic Graph Learning Score for Protein-Ligand Binding Scoring, Ranking, Docking, and Screening.
    Nguyen DD; Wei GW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jul; 59(7):3291-3304. PubMed ID: 31257871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Machine-learning scoring functions trained on complexes dissimilar to the test set already outperform classical counterparts on a blind benchmark.
    Li H; Lu G; Sze KH; Su X; Chan WY; Leung KS
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34169324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Functions.
    Liu Z; Su M; Han L; Liu J; Yang Q; Li Y; Wang R
    Acc Chem Res; 2017 Feb; 50(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 28182403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A fully differentiable ligand pose optimization framework guided by deep learning and a traditional scoring function.
    Wang Z; Zheng L; Wang S; Lin M; Wang Z; Kong AW; Mu Y; Wei Y; Li W
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36502369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking.
    Ballester PJ; Mitchell JB
    Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 26(9):1169-75. PubMed ID: 20236947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.
    Li Y; Han L; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1717-36. PubMed ID: 24708446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.