These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36722733)

  • 21. A new paradigm for applying deep learning to protein-ligand interaction prediction.
    Wang Z; Wang S; Li Y; Guo J; Wei Y; Mu Y; Zheng L; Li W
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 Mar; 25(3):. PubMed ID: 38581420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. SMPLIP-Score: predicting ligand binding affinity from simple and interpretable on-the-fly interaction fingerprint pattern descriptors.
    Kumar S; Kim MH
    J Cheminform; 2021 Mar; 13(1):28. PubMed ID: 33766140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Learning protein-ligand binding affinity with atomic environment vectors.
    Meli R; Anighoro A; Bodkin MJ; Morris GM; Biggin PC
    J Cheminform; 2021 Aug; 13(1):59. PubMed ID: 34391475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Boosting Protein-Ligand Binding Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Based on Residue-Atom Distance Likelihood Potential and Graph Transformer.
    Shen C; Zhang X; Deng Y; Gao J; Wang D; Xu L; Pan P; Hou T; Kang Y
    J Med Chem; 2022 Aug; 65(15):10691-10706. PubMed ID: 35917397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development and evaluation of a deep learning model for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
    Stepniewska-Dziubinska MM; Zielenkiewicz P; Siedlecki P
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 34(21):3666-3674. PubMed ID: 29757353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A New Hybrid Neural Network Deep Learning Method for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction and De Novo Drug Design.
    Limbu S; Dakshanamurthy S
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 36430386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Tapping on the Black Box: How Is the Scoring Power of a Machine-Learning Scoring Function Dependent on the Training Set?
    Su M; Feng G; Liu Z; Li Y; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Mar; 60(3):1122-1136. PubMed ID: 32085675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Machine learning on ligand-residue interaction profiles to significantly improve binding affinity prediction.
    Ji B; He X; Zhai J; Zhang Y; Man VH; Wang J
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33758923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Learning from the ligand: using ligand-based features to improve binding affinity prediction.
    Boyles F; Deane CM; Morris GM
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 36(3):758-764. PubMed ID: 31598630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dowker complex based machine learning (DCML) models for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
    Liu X; Feng H; Wu J; Xia K
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Apr; 18(4):e1009943. PubMed ID: 35385478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Learning from Docked Ligands: Ligand-Based Features Rescue Structure-Based Scoring Functions When Trained on Docked Poses.
    Boyles F; Deane CM; Morris GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5329-5341. PubMed ID: 34469150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can machine learning consistently improve the scoring power of classical scoring functions? Insights into the role of machine learning in scoring functions.
    Shen C; Hu Y; Wang Z; Zhang X; Zhong H; Wang G; Yao X; Xu L; Cao D; Hou T
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jan; 22(1):497-514. PubMed ID: 31982914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. PLANET: A Multi-objective Graph Neural Network Model for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Zhang X; Gao H; Wang H; Chen Z; Zhang Z; Chen X; Li Y; Qi Y; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Apr; 64(7):2205-2220. PubMed ID: 37319418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Protein-Ligand Docking in the Machine-Learning Era.
    Yang C; Chen EA; Zhang Y
    Molecules; 2022 Jul; 27(14):. PubMed ID: 35889440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving protein-ligand docking and screening accuracies by incorporating a scoring function correction term.
    Zheng L; Meng J; Jiang K; Lan H; Wang Z; Lin M; Li W; Guo H; Wei Y; Mu Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 May; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35289359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Structural and Sequence Similarity Makes a Significant Impact on Machine-Learning-Based Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Interactions.
    Li Y; Yang J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Apr; 57(4):1007-1012. PubMed ID: 28358210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Impact of Crystallographic Data for the Development of Machine Learning Models to Predict Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity.
    Veit-Acosta M; de Azevedo Junior WF
    Curr Med Chem; 2021 Oct; 28(34):7006-7022. PubMed ID: 33568025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Comparative Assessment of Predictive Accuracies of Conventional and Machine Learning Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(2):335-47. PubMed ID: 26357221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improving scoring-docking-screening powers of protein-ligand scoring functions using random forest.
    Wang C; Zhang Y
    J Comput Chem; 2017 Jan; 38(3):169-177. PubMed ID: 27859414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computationally predicting binding affinity in protein-ligand complexes: free energy-based simulations and machine learning-based scoring functions.
    Wang DD; Zhu M; Yan H
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32591817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.