These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36722782)

  • 1. Retire the Conventional Laryngoscope?
    Bailey C; Dela Cruz R; Burns S; Austin PN
    AANA J; 2023 Feb; 91(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 36722782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of three video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for emergency endotracheal intubation: a retrospective cohort study.
    Suzuki K; Kusunoki S; Tanigawa K; Shime N
    BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e024927. PubMed ID: 30928937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.
    Lewis SR; Butler AR; Parker J; Cook TM; Smith AF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 11(11):CD011136. PubMed ID: 27844477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
    Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should the Glidescope video laryngoscope be used first line for all oral intubations or only in those with a difficult airway? A review of current literature.
    Russell TM; Hormis A;
    J Perioper Pract; 2018 Dec; 28(12):322-333. PubMed ID: 30035689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer].
    Ruetzler K; Imach S; Weiss M; Haas T; Schmidt AR
    Anaesthesist; 2015 Jul; 64(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 26174747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.
    Sakles JC; Mosier J; Chiu S; Cosentino M; Kalin L
    Ann Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 60(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 22560464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Video Laryngoscopy Improves Intubation Times With Level C Personal Protective Equipment in Novice Physicians: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Study.
    Pantazopoulos I; Kolonia K; Laou E; Mermiri M; Tsolaki V; Koutsovasilis A; Zakynthinos G; Gourgoulianis K; Arnaoutoglou E; Chalkias A
    J Emerg Med; 2021 Jun; 60(6):764-771. PubMed ID: 33579655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim.
    Wetsch WA; Carlitscheck M; Spelten O; Teschendorf P; Hellmich M; Genzwürker HV; Hinkelbein J
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 28(12):849-58. PubMed ID: 21986981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the C-MAC D-Blade Versus the GlideScope in a Mixed Provider and Diverse Patient Population.
    Aziz MF; Abrons RO; Cattano D; Bayman EO; Swanson DE; Hagberg CA; Todd MM; Brambrink AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Mar; 122(3):740-750. PubMed ID: 26579847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Direct laryngoscopy or C-MAC video laryngoscopy? Routine tracheal intubation in patients undergoing ENT surgery].
    Meininger D; Strouhal U; Weber CF; Fogl D; Holzer L; Zacharowski K; Byhahn C
    Anaesthesist; 2010 Sep; 59(9):806-11. PubMed ID: 20703441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the storz video Macintosh laryngoscope for use in difficult airways: A human simulator study.
    Bair AE; Olmsted K; Brown CA; Barker T; Pallin D; Walls RM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1134-7. PubMed ID: 21064263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Performance between Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope and McGRATH® MAC Video Laryngoscope among Anesthesia Trainees].
    Kasuya Y; Takahashi E; Nagai M; Ozaki M
    Masui; 2015 Dec; 64(12):1291-6. PubMed ID: 26790337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between years of anesthesia experience and first-time intubation success rate with direct laryngoscope and video laryngoscope in infants: a retrospective observational study.
    Uchinami Y; Fujita N; Ando T; Mizunoya K; Hoshino K; Yokota I; Morimoto Y
    J Anesth; 2022 Dec; 36(6):707-714. PubMed ID: 36125551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations.
    Zhu H; Liu J; Suo L; Zhou C; Sun Y; Jiang H
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31470814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.
    Aziz MF; Dillman D; Fu R; Brambrink AM
    Anesthesiology; 2012 Mar; 116(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 22261795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexible video endoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal tracheal intubation in the lateral position: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Gao Y; Lin B; Huang J; Lin X; Lin C
    Trials; 2019 Mar; 20(1):166. PubMed ID: 30876450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the McGrath MAC and Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in 2000 patients undergoing general anaesthesia: the randomised multicentre EMMA trial study protocol.
    Kriege M; Alflen C; Tzanova I; Schmidtmann I; Piepho T; Noppens RR
    BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016907. PubMed ID: 28827261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. McGrath Video Laryngoscope Versus Macintosh Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation of Morbidly Obese Patients: A Randomized Trial.
    Ruetzler K; Rivas E; Cohen B; Mosteller L; Martin A; Keebler A; Maheshwari K; Steckner K; Wang M; Praveen C; Khanna S; Makarova N; Sessler DI; Turan A
    Anesth Analg; 2020 Aug; 131(2):586-593. PubMed ID: 32175948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Video laryngoscope versus USB borescope-aided endotracheal intubation in adults with anticipated difficult airway: a prospective randomized controlled study.
    Elshazly M; Medhat M; Marzouk S; Samir EM
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2022 Aug; 75(4):331-337. PubMed ID: 35581709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.