189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36724750)
1. Impact of Hysterotomy Closure Technique on Subsequent Cesarean Scar Defects Formation: A Systematic Review.
Genovese F; Schiattarella A; D'Urso G; Vitale SG; Carugno J; Verzì G; D'Urso V; Iacono E; Siringo S; Leanza V; Palumbo M
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 36724750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saccone G; McCurdy R; Bujold E; Bifulco G; Berghella V
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 28070914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study.
Tekiner NB; Çetin BA; Türkgeldi LS; Yılmaz G; Polat İ; Gedikbaşı A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 29397441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new technique for uterine incision closure at the time of cesarean section: does it make a difference?
Elkhouly NI; Abdelaal NK; Solyman AE; Elkelani OA; Elbasueny BF; Elhalaby AF
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 34155957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: Laparoscopic Resection and Total Scar Dehiscence Repair.
Mahgoub S; Gabriele V; Faller E; Langer B; Wattiez A; Lecointre L; Akladios C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 25(2):297-298. PubMed ID: 28179198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after elective second cesarean section.
Tekelioğlu M; Karataş S; Güralp O; Murat Alınca C; Ender Yumru A; Tuğ N
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):943-947. PubMed ID: 31146610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Single vs. Double Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: The Effect on Uterine Scar Thickness.
Bamberg C; Dudenhausen JW; Bujak V; Rodekamp E; Brauer M; Hinkson L; Kalache K; Henrich W
Ultraschall Med; 2018 Jun; 39(3):343-351. PubMed ID: 27626240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic removal of cesarean scar ectopic and hysterotomy revision.
Siedhoff MT; Schiff LD; Moulder JK; Toubia T; Ivester T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):681.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25499261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longitudinal transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of cesarean scar niche incidence and depth in the first two years after single- or double-layer uterotomy closure: a randomized controlled trial.
Bamberg C; Hinkson L; Dudenhausen JW; Bujak V; Kalache KD; Henrich W
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Dec; 96(12):1484-1489. PubMed ID: 28832909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of Uterine Incision Closure Techniques on Post-cesarean Delivery Niche Formation and Size: Sonohysterographic Examination of Nonpregnant Women.
Antoine C; Meyer JA; Silverstein JS; Alexander J; Oh C; Timor-Tritsch IE
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jul; 41(7):1763-1771. PubMed ID: 34726789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.
Hamar BD; Saber SB; Cackovic M; Magloire LK; Pettker CM; Abdel-Razeq SS; Rosenberg VA; Buhimschi IA; Buhimschi CS
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):808-13. PubMed ID: 17906013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications.
Tower AM; Frishman GN
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(5):562-72. PubMed ID: 23680518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the primary cesarean hysterotomy scars after single- and double-layer interrupted closure.
Kataoka S; Tanuma F; Iwaki Y; Iwaki K; Fujii T; Fujimoto T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Dec; 95(12):1352-1358. PubMed ID: 27617416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Isthmocele: an overview of diagnosis and treatment.
Kremer TG; Ghiorzi IB; Dibi RP
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2019 Jun; 65(5):714-721. PubMed ID: 31166450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial.
Vikhareva O; Rickle GS; Lavesson T; Nedopekina E; Brandell K; Salvesen KÅ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):438-442. PubMed ID: 30484920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women.
Vikhareva Osser O; Valentin L
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):525-532. PubMed ID: 21343754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of uterine closure technique on cesarean scar niche development after multiple cesarean deliveries.
Meyer JA; Silverstein J; Timor-Tritsch IE; Antoine C
J Perinat Med; 2024 Feb; 52(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 38081042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Emerging Manifestations of Cesarean Scar Defect in Reproductive-aged Women.
Tulandi T; Cohen A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):893-902. PubMed ID: 27393285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial.
Mohr-Sasson A; Castel E; Dadon T; Brandt A; Etinger R; Cohen A; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 May; 309(5):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 38498161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Babu and Magon uterine closure technique during cesarean section: A randomized double-blind trial.
Tahermanesh K; Mirgalobayat S; Aziz-Ahari A; Maleki M; Hashemi N; Samimi M; Fazel Anvari-Yazdi A; Shahriyaripour R; Pecks U; Allahqoli L; Alkatout I
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Sep; 47(9):3186-3195. PubMed ID: 34131999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
