These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36724767)

  • 1. Neural Mechanisms of the Acceptable Noise Level.
    Miller SE; Anderson C; Montou O; Lam BPW; Schafer E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Feb; 66(2):765-774. PubMed ID: 36724767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acceptance of background noise, working memory capacity, and auditory evoked potentials in subjects with normal hearing.
    Brännström KJ; Zunic E; Borovac A; Ibertsson T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):542-52. PubMed ID: 22992261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of speech presentation level on acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal hearing.
    Franklin CA; Thelin JW; Nabelek AK; Burchfield SB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Feb; 17(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 16640066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Correlation between Mandarin acceptable noise level and cortical auditory evoked potential in young normal-hearing listeners].
    Chen J; Zhu H; Shen J; Ma X; Wang W; Sun J; Chen X; Yang J
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Sep; 36(9):679-684. PubMed ID: 36036068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Acceptable Noise Level Generated Using Different Transducers and Response Modes.
    Xia L; He J; Sun Y; Chen Y; Luo Q; Shi H; Feng Y; Yin S
    Neural Plast; 2018; 2018():3786489. PubMed ID: 30046301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.
    Recker KL; Edwards BW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intertester reliability of the acceptable noise level.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Adams E; Moore R; Gaal A; Berry K; Brock S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):534-41. PubMed ID: 22992260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Plyler PN; Thelin JW; Hedrick MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Plyler PN; Madix SG; Thelin JW; Johnston KW
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18056883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of repeated measurements and working memory on the most comfortable level in the ANL test.
    Brännström KJ; Olsen SØ; Holm L; Kastberg T; Ibertsson T
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Nov; 53(11):787-95. PubMed ID: 25156233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acceptance of noise with intelligible, reversed, and unfamiliar primary discourse.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Moore RE
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 17(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 18840706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of noise reduction technologies on the acceptance of background noise.
    Lowery KJ; Plyler PN
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):649-59. PubMed ID: 24131601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Most comfortable listening levels, background noise levels, and acceptable noise levels for children and adults with normal hearing.
    Moore R; Gordon-Hickey S; Jones A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):286-93. PubMed ID: 21756844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Transducer Selection on the Acceptable Noise Level.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Bryan MF; Davis S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 35577056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effects of Audiovisual Stimulation on the Acceptance of Background Noise.
    Plyler PN; Lang R; Monroe AL; Gaudiano P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):451-460. PubMed ID: 26055835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship Between Auditory and Visual Noise Acceptance in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    Faulkner KF; Plyler PN; Easterday MK; Slade TM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Feb; 31(2):118-128. PubMed ID: 31287056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech Recognition at the Acceptable Noise Level.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Morlas H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):443-450. PubMed ID: 26055834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acceptable Noise Levels and Preferred Signal-to-noise Ratios for Speech and Music.
    Lee D; Lewis JD; Johnstone PM; Plyler PN
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):1013-1022. PubMed ID: 34759206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acceptable noise levels in preschool children with normal hearing.
    Bryan MF; Franklin C; Ware KS; Horne R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):823-31; quiz 891-2. PubMed ID: 24224989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.