145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36725965)
1. Appropriate screening mammography method for patients with breast implants.
Park J; Ko EY; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Kim H
Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):1811. PubMed ID: 36725965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mean glandular dose in digital mamography in women with breast implants.
Couto LS; Freitas-Junior R; Correa RS; Peixoto JE; Almeida CD; Rodrigues DCN; Glassman LM; Soares LR
J Radiol Prot; 2019 Apr; 39(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 30812019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are All Views with and without Displacement Maneuver Necessary in Augmentation Mammography? Putting Numbers Into Perspective.
Couto LS; Freitas-Junior R; Corrêa RS; Lauar MV; Bauab SP; Urban LABD; Cruvinel-Filho JLO; Soares LR; Savaris RF
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jan; 23(1):233-239. PubMed ID: 35092393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis.
Gennaro G; Hendrick RE; Toledano A; Paquelet JR; Bezzon E; Chersevani R; di Maggio C; La Grassa M; Pescarini L; Polico I; Proietti A; Baldan E; Pomerri F; Muzzio PC
Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2087-94. PubMed ID: 23620367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvements of an objective model of compressed breasts undergoing mammography: Generation and characterization of breast shapes.
Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Feng SSJ; van Zelst J; Vreemann S; Mann JR; D'Orsi CJ; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2161-2172. PubMed ID: 28244109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density.
Shin SU; Chang JM; Bae MS; Lee SH; Cho N; Seo M; Kim WH; Moon WK
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25182628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening?
Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geometry-Based Pectoral Muscle Segmentation From MLO Mammogram Views.
Taghanaki SA; Liu Y; Miles B; Hamarneh G
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2662-2671. PubMed ID: 28129144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Regression Analysis between the Different Breast Dose Quantities Reported in Digital Mammography and Patient Age, Breast Thickness, and Acquisition Parameters.
Dhou S; Dalah E; AlGhafeer R; Hamidu A; Obaideen A
J Imaging; 2022 Jul; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 36005454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography in females with an implanted medical device: impact on image quality, pain and anxiety.
Paap E; Witjes M; van Landsveld-Verhoeven C; Pijnappel RM; Maas AH; Broeders MJ
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160142. PubMed ID: 27452263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program.
Wilczek B; Wilczek HE; Rasouliyan L; Leifland K
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1554-63. PubMed ID: 27501888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective models of compressed breast shapes undergoing mammography.
Feng SS; Patel B; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031902. PubMed ID: 23464317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography with and without radiolucent positioning sheets: Comparison of projected breast area, pain experience, radiation dose and technical image quality.
Timmers J; Voorde MT; Engen RE; Landsveld-Verhoeven Cv; Pijnappel R; Greve KD; Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1903-9. PubMed ID: 26272030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Replacing single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital mammography (DM) with synthesized mammography (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images: Comparison of the diagnostic performance and radiation dose with two-view DM with or without MLO-DBT.
Kang HJ; Chang JM; Lee J; Song SE; Shin SU; Kim WH; Bae MS; Moon WK
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2042-2048. PubMed ID: 27776658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of Short-Term Breast Cancer Risk with Fusion of CC- and MLO-Based Risk Models in Four-View Mammograms.
Li Y; Yuan W; Fan M; Zheng B; Li L
J Digit Imaging; 2022 Aug; 35(4):910-922. PubMed ID: 35262841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. INSTITUTIONAL BREAST DOSES IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY.
Lekatou A; Metaxas V; Messaris G; Antzele P; Tzavellas G; Panayiotakis G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(2):239-251. PubMed ID: 30753684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient dose in digital mammography.
Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fibroglandular tissue distribution in the breast during mammography and tomosynthesis based on breast CT data: A patient-based characterization of the breast parenchyma.
Fedon C; Caballo M; García E; Diaz O; Boone JM; Dance DR; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1436-1447. PubMed ID: 33452822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
