222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36726079)
1. Clinical efficacy and re-pregnancy outcomes of patients with previous cesarean scar pregnancy treated with either high-intensity focused ultrasound or uterine artery embolization before ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage: a retrospective cohort study.
Wang X; Yang B; Chen W; Chen J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Feb; 23(1):85. PubMed ID: 36726079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization in the treatment and management of cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study.
Hong Y; Guo Q; Pu Y; Lu D; Hu M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jul; 96(30):e7687. PubMed ID: 28746234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy: a comparison of different HIFU sonication strategies.
Yin Y; Pan F; He M; Zhang C; Liu Y
Int J Hyperthermia; 2022; 39(1):390-396. PubMed ID: 35196957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Chen L; Xiao S; Zhu X; He S; Xue M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):883-890. PubMed ID: 30205163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Compared with Uterine Artery Embolization in Cesarean Section Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis.
Liu Y; Wang L; Zhu X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Jun; 30(6):446-454. PubMed ID: 36893898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Superior to Uterine Artery Embolization in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes? A Meta-analysis of the Chinese Population.
Li Y; Hua C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 30(3):180-191. PubMed ID: 36442750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of menstruation recovery after ultrasound-guided suction curettage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy pretreated using high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization.
Dai Y; Peng Y; Shi Q; Jin P; Wang Z
Int J Hyperthermia; 2023; 40(1):2241686. PubMed ID: 37698065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in patients following treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with high intensity focused ultrasound followed by ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage.
Zhang C; Zhang Y; He J; Zhang L
Int J Hyperthermia; 2019; 36(1):926-931. PubMed ID: 31466485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolisation for the management of caesarean scar pregnancy.
Zhu X; Deng X; Xiao S; Wan Y; Xue M
Int J Hyperthermia; 2016; 32(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 26644262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II.
Liu Y; Yin Q; Xu F; Luo S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Jul; 22(1):607. PubMed ID: 35907811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization in Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis.
Xiao X; Feng Z; Li T; Yi B; Zhang S; Wang W
Adv Ther; 2019 Jun; 36(6):1314-1325. PubMed ID: 31049875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical efficacy and safety between high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization for cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Mi W; Pei P; Zheng Y
Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jun; 10(6):6379-6387. PubMed ID: 34237960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of clinical safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection versus uterine artery embolization in the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Du Z; Xu W; Lu J; Li C
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Mar; 23(1):149. PubMed ID: 36882695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dilatation and Curettage after Uterine Artery Embolization versus Methotrexate Injection for the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Single-Center Experience.
Pecorino B; Scibilia G; Mignosa B; Teodoro MC; Chiofalo B; Scollo P
Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Mar; 60(3):. PubMed ID: 38541213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Long Y; Zhu H; Hu Y; Shen L; Fu J; Huang W
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD011174. PubMed ID: 32609376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of the type of cesarean scar pregnancy impacted on the effectiveness and safety of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment.
Peng Y; Dai Y; Yu G; Jin P
Int J Hyperthermia; 2022; 39(1):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 36414236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Curettage With and Without Uterine Artery Embolization on Controlling Intraoperative Blood Loss for a Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treatment: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Tang Y; Zhang Y; Tang H; Che J; Feng H; Yao X; Chen Q
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():651273. PubMed ID: 34194390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy vs. uterine curettage in the uterine artery embolization-based management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.
He Y; Wu X; Zhu Q; Wu X; Feng L; Wu X; Zhao A; Di W
BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep; 14():116. PubMed ID: 25248928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When to perform curettage after uterine artery embolization for cesarean scar pregnancy: a clinical study.
Wang Q; Peng H; Zhao X; Qi X
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 May; 21(1):367. PubMed ID: 33971838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-intensity focused ultrasound compared with uterine artery chemoembolization with methotrexate for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Wang W; Chen Y; Yang Y; Qu D; Jiang J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 158(3):572-578. PubMed ID: 34797925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
