These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36726498)

  • 1. Why scapegoating can ruin an apology: The mediated-moderation model of appropriate crisis response messages in the context of South Korea.
    Youk S; Park HS
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1082152. PubMed ID: 36726498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Costly group apology communicates a group's sincere "intention".
    Ohtsubo Y; Matsunaga M; Himichi T; Suzuki K; Shibata E; Hori R; Umemura T; Ohira H
    Soc Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 15(2):244-254. PubMed ID: 31762397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Socio-Ecological Hypothesis of Reconciliation: Cultural, Individual, and Situational Variations in Willingness to Accept Apology or Compensation.
    Komiya A; Ozono H; Watabe M; Miyamoto Y; Ohtsubo Y; Oishi S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1761. PubMed ID: 32793075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural Correlates of Public Apology Effectiveness.
    Kim H; Kralik JD; Yun K; Chung YA; Jeong J
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():229. PubMed ID: 31404234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond compensation? Examining the role of apologies in the restoration of victims' needs in simulated tort cases.
    Reinders Folmer CP; Desmet PTM; Van Boom WH
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Aug; 43(4):329-341. PubMed ID: 31192628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sorry to ask but … how is apology effectiveness dependent on apology content and gender?
    Polin B; Doyle SP; Kim S; Lewicki RJ; Chawla N
    J Appl Psychol; 2024 Mar; 109(3):339-361. PubMed ID: 37856409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring the Antecedents to the Reputation of Chinese Public Sector Organizations During COVID-19: An Extension of Situational Crisis Communication Theory.
    Chunxia Z; Fei W; Wei F
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():818939. PubMed ID: 35769730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Apologies Repair Trust via Perceived Trustworthiness and Negative Emotions.
    Ma F; Wylie BE; Luo X; He Z; Jiang R; Zhang Y; Xu F; Evans AD
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():758. PubMed ID: 31001183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of cross-cultural gender-wise stereotypes in apologizing through film series.
    Moafian F; Sarkhosh M; Khajevand Nourashrafi F
    Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(9):e30508. PubMed ID: 38756595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quasi-Experiment Study on Effectiveness Evaluation of Health Communication Strategies.
    Song DJ; Choi JW; Kim K; Kim MS; Moon JM
    J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1027-36. PubMed ID: 27365998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Possibility of Sincere Apology in Restorative Justice: When and How?
    Suzuki M
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2022 Oct; ():306624X221132238. PubMed ID: 36314465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sorry, Not Sorry: Effects of Different Types of Apologies and Self-Monitoring on Non-verbal Behaviors.
    Yamamoto K; Kimura M; Osaka M
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():689615. PubMed ID: 34512447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Social Consequences of Frequent Versus Infrequent Apologizing.
    Schumann K; Ritchie EG; Forest A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Mar; 49(3):331-343. PubMed ID: 34964400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What happens when groups say sorry: the effect of intergroup apologies on their recipients.
    Philpot CR; Hornsey MJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Apr; 34(4):474-87. PubMed ID: 18340033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Culturally Grounded Scapegoating in Response to Illness and the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Yang Q; Young IF; Wan J; Sullivan D
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():632641. PubMed ID: 33889110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining Crisis Communication Using Semantic Network and Sentiment Analysis: A Case Study on NetEase Games.
    Che S; Nan D; Kamphuis P; Zhang S; Kim JH
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():823415. PubMed ID: 35185736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Political apologies and their acceptance: Experimental evidence from victims and perpetrators nations.
    David R; Tam PC
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2024 Jan; 63(1):273-294. PubMed ID: 37578247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Belief in the malleability of groups strengthens the tenuous link between a collective apology and intergroup forgiveness.
    Wohl MJ; Cohen-Chen S; Halperin E; Caouette J; Hayes N; Hornsey MJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):714-25. PubMed ID: 25767157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why group apologies succeed and fail: intergroup forgiveness and the role of primary and secondary emotions.
    Wohl MJ; Hornsey MJ; Bennett SH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Feb; 102(2):306-22. PubMed ID: 21806306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Relationship Between Communicative Actions, Behavioral Intentions, and Corporate Reputation in the Framework of Situational Theory of Problem Solving in a Public Health Crisis.
    Akbulut E
    Int J Public Health; 2023; 68():1606301. PubMed ID: 38105905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.