BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36726825)

  • 21. Environmental risk assessment of hydrotropes in the United States, Europe, and Australia.
    Stanton K; Tibazarwa C; Certa H; Greggs W; Hillebold D; Jovanovich L; Woltering D; Sedlak R
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jan; 6(1):155-63. PubMed ID: 19558203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Parameters for assessing the aquatic environmental impact of cosmetic products.
    Vita NA; Brohem CA; Canavez ADPM; Oliveira CFS; Kruger O; Lorencini M; Carvalho CM
    Toxicol Lett; 2018 May; 287():70-82. PubMed ID: 29408348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Identification of Potential PBT/POP-Like Chemicals by a Deep Learning Approach Based on 2D Structural Features.
    Sun X; Zhang X; Muir DCG; Zeng EY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jul; 54(13):8221-8231. PubMed ID: 32484664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of metals in cosmetics commonly used in Saudi Arabia.
    Salama AK
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Oct; 188(10):553. PubMed ID: 27613289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Final report of the safety assessment of L-Ascorbic Acid, Calcium Ascorbate, Magnesium Ascorbate, Magnesium Ascorbyl Phosphate, Sodium Ascorbate, and Sodium Ascorbyl Phosphate as used in cosmetics.
    Elmore AR
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24 Suppl 2():51-111. PubMed ID: 16154915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Screening for PBT chemicals among the "existing" and "new" chemicals of the EU.
    Strempel S; Scheringer M; Ng CA; Hungerbühler K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jun; 46(11):5680-7. PubMed ID: 22494215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Occurrence of personal care products as emerging chemicals of concern in water resources: A review.
    Montes-Grajales D; Fennix-Agudelo M; Miranda-Castro W
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Oct; 595():601-614. PubMed ID: 28399499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Global distribution and ecological risk assessment of synthetic musks in the environment.
    Wang T; Zou H; Li D; Gao J; Bu Q; Wang Z
    Environ Pollut; 2023 Aug; 331(Pt 2):121893. PubMed ID: 37245793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The associations between personal care products use and urinary concentrations of phthalates, parabens, and triclosan in various age groups: The Korean National Environmental Health Survey Cycle 3 2015-2017.
    Lim S
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Nov; 742():140640. PubMed ID: 32721747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cosmetics as a potential source of environmental contamination in the UK.
    Dhanirama D; Gronow J; Voulvoulis N
    Environ Technol; 2012; 33(13-15):1597-608. PubMed ID: 22988620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Personal care product use among diverse women in California: Taking Stock Study.
    Dodson RE; Cardona B; Zota AR; Robinson Flint J; Navarro S; Shamasunder B
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2021 May; 31(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 33958707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The distribution, fate, and effects of propylene glycol substances in the environment.
    West R; Banton M; Hu J; Klapacz J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 232():107-38. PubMed ID: 24984837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH.
    Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In the shadow of the Cosmetic Directive--inconsistencies in EU environmental hazard classification requirements for UV-filters.
    Sobek A; Bejgarn S; Rudén C; Molander L; Breitholtz M
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Sep; 461-462():706-11. PubMed ID: 23770551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Final report of the safety assessment of Alcohol Denat., including SD Alcohol 3-A, SD Alcohol 30, SD Alcohol 39, SD Alcohol 39-B, SD Alcohol 39-C, SD Alcohol 40, SD Alcohol 40-B, and SD Alcohol 40-C, and the denaturants, Quassin, Brucine Sulfate/Brucine, and Denatonium Benzoate.
    Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel
    Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 1():1-43. PubMed ID: 18569160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. PBT assessment and prioritization by PBT Index and consensus modeling: comparison of screening results from structural models.
    Gramatica P; Cassani S; Sangion A
    Environ Int; 2015 Apr; 77():25-34. PubMed ID: 25617903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The potential ecotoxicological impact of pharmaceutical and personal care products on humans and freshwater, based on USEtox™ characterization factors. A Spanish case study of toxicity impact scores.
    Ortiz de García S; García-Encina PA; Irusta-Mata R
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 609():429-445. PubMed ID: 28755593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Final amended report on the safety assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products.
    Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 4():1-82. PubMed ID: 19101832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fugacity and activity analysis of the bioaccumulation and environmental risks of decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5).
    Gobas FA; Xu S; Kozerski G; Powell DE; Woodburn KB; Mackay D; Fairbrother A
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2723-31. PubMed ID: 26211424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Engineered inorganic nanoparticles and cosmetics: facts, issues, knowledge gaps and challenges.
    Wiechers JW; Musee N
    J Biomed Nanotechnol; 2010 Oct; 6(5):408-31. PubMed ID: 21329039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.