These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36727489)

  • 1. WMDS.net: a network control framework for identifying key players in transcriptome programs.
    Cheng X; Amanullah M; Liu W; Liu Y; Pan X; Zhang H; Xu H; Liu P; Lu Y
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Feb; 39(2):. PubMed ID: 36727489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel network control model for identifying personalized driver genes in cancer.
    Guo WF; Zhang SW; Zeng T; Li Y; Gao J; Chen L
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Nov; 15(11):e1007520. PubMed ID: 31765387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MODIG: integrating multi-omics and multi-dimensional gene network for cancer driver gene identification based on graph attention network model.
    Zhao W; Gu X; Chen S; Wu J; Zhou Z
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Oct; 38(21):4901-4907. PubMed ID: 36094338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. WDNfinder: A method for minimum driver node set detection and analysis in directed and weighted biological network.
    Chu Y; Wang Z; Wang R; Zhang N; Li J; Hu Y; Teng M; Wang Y
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2017 Oct; 15(5):1750021. PubMed ID: 28918707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Target controllability with minimal mediators in complex biological networks.
    Ebrahimi A; Nowzari-Dalini A; Jalili M; Masoudi-Nejad A
    Genomics; 2020 Nov; 112(6):4938-4944. PubMed ID: 32905831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determining minimum set of driver nodes in protein-protein interaction networks.
    Zhang XF; Ou-Yang L; Zhu Y; Wu MY; Dai DQ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():146. PubMed ID: 25947063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discovering personalized driver mutation profiles of single samples in cancer by network control strategy.
    Guo WF; Zhang SW; Liu LL; Liu F; Shi QQ; Zhang L; Tang Y; Zeng T; Chen L
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jun; 34(11):1893-1903. PubMed ID: 29329368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controllability analysis of transcriptional regulatory networks reveals circular control patterns among transcription factors.
    Österlund T; Bordel S; Nielsen J
    Integr Biol (Camb); 2015 May; 7(5):560-8. PubMed ID: 25855217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hierarchical HotNet: identifying hierarchies of altered subnetworks.
    Reyna MA; Leiserson MDM; Raphael BJ
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Sep; 34(17):i972-i980. PubMed ID: 30423088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-specific driver nodes in human protein interaction networks.
    Zhang XF; Ou-Yang L; Dai DQ; Wu MY; Zhu Y; Yan H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 17(1):358. PubMed ID: 27612563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. miRGTF-net: Integrative miRNA-gene-TF network analysis reveals key drivers of breast cancer recurrence.
    Nersisyan S; Galatenko A; Galatenko V; Shkurnikov M; Tonevitsky A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249424. PubMed ID: 33852600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DriverGroup: a novel method for identifying driver gene groups.
    Pham VVH; Liu L; Bracken CP; Goodall GJ; Li J; Le TD
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 36(Suppl_2):i583-i591. PubMed ID: 33381812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prioritization of cancer driver gene with prize-collecting steiner tree by introducing an edge weighted strategy in the personalized gene interaction network.
    Zhang SW; Wang ZN; Li Y; Guo WF
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Aug; 23(1):341. PubMed ID: 35974311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of key player genes in gene regulatory networks.
    Nazarieh M; Wiese A; Will T; Hamed M; Helms V
    BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Sep; 10(1):88. PubMed ID: 27599550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying strengths and weaknesses of methods for computational network inference from single-cell RNA-seq data.
    McCalla SG; Fotuhi Siahpirani A; Li J; Pyne S; Stone M; Periyasamy V; Shin J; Roy S
    G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 36626328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. lionessR: single sample network inference in R.
    Kuijjer ML; Hsieh PH; Quackenbush J; Glass K
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(1):1003. PubMed ID: 31653243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in network controllability and regional gene expression underlie hallucinations in Parkinson's disease.
    Zarkali A; McColgan P; Ryten M; Reynolds R; Leyland LA; Lees AJ; Rees G; Weil RS
    Brain; 2020 Dec; 143(11):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 33118028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Network controllability is determined by the density of low in-degree and out-degree nodes.
    Menichetti G; Dall'Asta L; Bianconi G
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Aug; 113(7):078701. PubMed ID: 25170736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Global stabilizing control of large-scale biomolecular regulatory networks.
    An S; Jang SY; Park SM; Lee CK; Kim HM; Cho KH
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36688702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of mutated core cancer modules by integrating somatic mutation, copy number variation, and gene expression data.
    Zhang J; Zhang S; Wang Y; Zhang XS
    BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S4. PubMed ID: 24565034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.