These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36727584)

  • 1. Influence of drilling sequence and guide-hole design on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery in extraction sockets and healed sites-An in vitro investigation.
    Raabe C; Dulla FA; Yilmaz B; Chappuis V; Abou-Ayash S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Apr; 34(4):320-329. PubMed ID: 36727584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of keyless vs drill-key implant systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery using two guide-hole designs compared to freehand implant placement: an in vitro study.
    Raabe C; Schuetz TS; Chappuis V; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S; Couso-Queiruga E
    Int J Implant Dent; 2023 Feb; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 36749441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of alveolar ridge morphology and guide-hole design on the accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery with two implant macro-designs: An in vitro study.
    Dulla FA; Couso-Queiruga E; Chappuis V; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S; Raabe C
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104426. PubMed ID: 36652971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does guided level (fully or partially) influence implant placement accuracy at post-extraction sockets and healed sites? An in vitro study.
    Chen Z; Li J; Ceolin Meneghetti P; Galli M; Mendonça G; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Aug; 26(8):5449-5458. PubMed ID: 35499656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positional accuracy during the sequence of static computer-assisted implant surgery in three alveolar ridge morphologies: An in vitro study.
    Raabe C; Abou-Ayash S; Yilmaz B; Surbek FJ; Chappuis V; Couso-Queiruga E
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37955870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Open-sleeve templates for computer-assisted implant surgery at healed or extraction sockets: An in vitro comparison to closed-sleeve guided system and free-hand approach.
    Li J; Meneghetti PC; Galli M; Mendonca G; Chen Z; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jul; 33(7):757-767. PubMed ID: 35578783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of guided sleeve height, drilling distance, and drilling key length on the accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    El Kholy K; Janner SFM; Schimmel M; Buser D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30589502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the accuracy of implant placement using different drilling systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study.
    Sittikornpaiboon P; Arunjaroensuk S; Kaboosaya B; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 23(4):635-643. PubMed ID: 34288341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of open-sleeved vs. closed-sleeved static computer-assisted implant systems in immediate maxillary molar implant placement: An in vitro study.
    Chen Z; Li J; Wei CX; Mendonca G; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jul; 35(7):694-705. PubMed ID: 38587183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    El Kholy K; Lazarin R; Janner SFM; Faerber K; Buser R; Buser D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 31381178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of implant placement in the posterior maxillary region depending on the alveolar residual bone height and sinus morphology: An in vitro study.
    Couso-Queiruga E; Spörri LA; Sabatini GP; Chappuis V; Abou-Ayash S; Yilmaz B; Raabe C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Aug; 35(8):954-963. PubMed ID: 37493201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate provisionalization of dental implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets: a 5-year prospective evaluation.
    Cooper LF; Reside GJ; Raes F; Garriga JS; Tarrida LG; Wiltfang J; Kern M; De Bruyn H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(3):709-17. PubMed ID: 24818212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes following immediate provisionalization of single-tooth dental implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets.
    Cooper LF; Raes F; Reside GJ; Garriga JS; Tarrida LG; Wiltfang J; Kern M; de Bruyn H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1222-32. PubMed ID: 21197501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Study on the influence of sleeve height and implant length on accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery].
    Wang QF; He ZD; Yu HY; Qiu XH; Wang YY; Han J; Yang J; Sun XD; Li XB; Li ZY; Fan H; Zhang J
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):902-907. PubMed ID: 33171566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sleeveless guided implant placement compared to conventional approaches: An in vitro study at healed sites and fresh extraction sockets.
    Galli M; Mendonça G; Meneghetti P; Bekkali M; Travan S; Wang HL; Li J
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2023 May; 16(2):117-132. PubMed ID: 37158181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immediate loading of a fully tapered implant with deep apical threads placed in healed alveolar ridges vs. immediate extraction sockets.
    Hadaya D; Pi-Anfruns J; Bellon B; Pippenger BE; Aghaloo TL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 May; 33(5):501-510. PubMed ID: 35213758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jorba-García A; González-Barnadas A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):2479-2494. PubMed ID: 33635397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Precision and trueness of computer-assisted implant placement using static surgical guides with open and closed sleeves: An in vitro analysis.
    Guentsch A; An H; Dentino AR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Apr; 33(4):441-450. PubMed ID: 35148444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative retrospective study of different surgical guide designs for static computer-assisted implant surgery in posterior single edentulous sites.
    De Souza AB; Kang M; Negreiros WM; El-Rafie K; Finkelman M; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jan; 33(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 34587320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.