These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36728107)

  • 1. Dynamic Behavior and Insertional Forces of a Precurved Electrode Using the Pull-Back Technique in a Fresh Microdissected Cochlea.
    Smetak MR; Riojas KE; Whittenbarger N; Noble JH; Labadie RF
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):324-330. PubMed ID: 36728107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Radeloff A; Mack M; Baghi M; Gstoettner WK; Adunka OF
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18090204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and periomodiolar precurved electrode arrays.
    Boyer E; Karkas A; Attye A; Lefournier V; Escude B; Schmerber S
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):422-9. PubMed ID: 25575374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a Slim Modiolar Electrode Array: A Temporal Bone Study.
    Asfour L; Risi F; Treaba C; Kirk J; Roland Thomas J
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Sep; 45(8):870-877. PubMed ID: 39142309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraoperative Correction of Cochlear Implant Electrode Translocation.
    Morrel WG; Manzoor NF; Dawant BM; Noble JH; Labadie RF
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(2):104-108. PubMed ID: 33915536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of insertion quality of a slim perimodiolar electrode array.
    Beck R; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Rauch AK; Ketterer MC
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; 281(3):1215-1220. PubMed ID: 37773530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prolonged Insertion Time Reduces Translocation Rate of a Precurved Electrode Array in Cochlear Implantation.
    van der Jagt AMA; Briaire JJ; Boehringer S; Verbist BM; Frijns JHM
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Apr; 43(4):e427-e434. PubMed ID: 35213473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a new mid-scala cochlear implant electrode using microcomputed tomography.
    Frisch CD; Carlson ML; Lane JI; Driscoll CL
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Dec; 125(12):2778-83. PubMed ID: 25946683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relations Between Scalar Shift and Insertion Depth in Human Cochlear Implantation.
    Zelener F; Majdani O; Roemer A; Lexow GJ; Giesemann A; Lenarz T; Warnecke A
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Feb; 41(2):178-185. PubMed ID: 31789806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An optically-guided cochlear implant sheath for real-time monitoring of electrode insertion into the human cochlea.
    Starovoyt A; Quirk BC; Putzeys T; Kerckhofs G; Nuyts J; Wouters J; McLaughlin RA; Verhaert N
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19234. PubMed ID: 36357503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Pull-Back Technique for the 532 Slim Modiolar Electrode.
    Riemann C; Sudhoff H; Todt I
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():6917084. PubMed ID: 31240221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal path generation in scala tympani and path planning for robotic cochlear implant of perimodiolar electrode.
    Wang Z; Li J; Wu Y; Zhu R; Wang B; Zhao K
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Jun; 234(6):578-589. PubMed ID: 32186227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
    Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory nerve fiber excitability for alternative electrode placement in the obstructed human cochlea: electrode insertion in scala vestibuli versus scala tympani.
    Fellner A; Wenger C; Heshmat A; Rattay F
    J Neural Eng; 2024 Aug; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 39029505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 May; 126(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16698696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of Scala Tympani Geometry on Insertion Forces during Implantation.
    Hrncirik F; Roberts IV; Swords C; Christopher PJ; Chhabu A; Gee AH; Bance ML
    Biosensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36354508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic pullback technique of a precurved cochlear-implant electrode array using real-time impedance sensing feedback.
    Riojas KE; Bruns TL; Granna J; Webster RJ; Labadie RF
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2023 Mar; 18(3):413-421. PubMed ID: 36331796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inroads toward robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery using steerable electrode arrays.
    Zhang J; Wei W; Ding J; Roland JT; Manolidis S; Simaan N
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Oct; 31(8):1199-206. PubMed ID: 20864880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Midmodiolar reconstruction as a valuable tool to determine the exact position of the cochlear implant electrode array.
    Lecerf P; Bakhos D; Cottier JP; Lescanne E; Trijolet JP; Robier A
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1075-81. PubMed ID: 21817940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanisms of electrode fold-over in cochlear implant surgery when using a flexible and slim perimodiolar electrode array.
    Ramos-Macias A; R De Miguel A; Falcon-González JC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 137(11):1129-1135. PubMed ID: 28784019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.