191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36728305)
1. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews on Bodyweight Management Strategies for Children and Adolescents.
Ho RS; Chui KY; Huang WY; Wong SH
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2023 May; 55(5):892-899. PubMed ID: 36728305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on atopic dermatitis treatments: a cross-sectional study.
Ho L; Cheung YMK; Choi CCC; Wu IX; Mao C; Chung VCH
J Dermatolog Treat; 2024 Dec; 35(1):2343072. PubMed ID: 38626923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study.
Ho L; Ke FYT; Wong CHL; Wu IXY; Cheung AKL; Mao C; Chung VCH
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):237. PubMed ID: 34717563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for osteoporosis: A cross-sectional study.
Tsoi AKN; Ho LTF; Wu IXY; Wong CHL; Ho RST; Lim JYY; Mao C; Lee EKP; Chung VCH
Bone; 2020 Oct; 139():115541. PubMed ID: 32730932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Chinese herbal medicine: a methodological survey.
Cheung AKL; Wong CHL; Ho L; Wu IXY; Ke FYT; Chung VCH
BMC Complement Med Ther; 2022 Feb; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35197038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on sepsis treatments: A cross-sectional study.
Ho L; Chen X; Kwok YL; Wu IXY; Mao C; Chung VCH
Am J Emerg Med; 2024 Mar; 77():21-28. PubMed ID: 38096636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR.
Wu X; Sun H; Zhou X; Wang J; Li J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 29548276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis on Asthma Treatments. A Cross-Sectional Study.
Wu IXY; Deng Y; Wang H; Chen Y; Wong CHL; Chung VCH
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2020 Aug; 17(8):949-957. PubMed ID: 32383967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness and safety of manual therapy for knee osteoarthritis: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Feng T; Wang X; Jin Z; Qin X; Sun C; Qi B; Zhang Y; Zhu L; Wei X
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1081238. PubMed ID: 36908468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.
Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 28720117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Appraisal methods and outcomes of AMSTAR 2 assessments in overviews of systematic reviews of interventions in the cardiovascular field: A methodological study.
Karakasis P; Bougioukas KI; Pamporis K; Fragakis N; Haidich AB
Res Synth Methods; 2024 Mar; 15(2):213-226. PubMed ID: 37956538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Hartling L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 28335734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PRISMA and AMSTAR show systematic reviews on health literacy and cancer screening are of good quality.
Sharma S; Oremus M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():123-131. PubMed ID: 29654821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study.
Gates A; Gates M; Duarte G; Cary M; Becker M; Prediger B; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 29898777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
