BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36728408)

  • 1. Breast Reconstruction Outcomes with and without Strattice: Long-Term Outcomes of a Multicenter Study Comparing Strattice Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction with Submuscular Implant Reconstruction.
    Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; Johnson RK; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Harvey JR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Jul; 152(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 36728408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes.
    Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Johnson RK; Harvey JR
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 34836730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Comparison of Strattice and SurgiMend in Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted, Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
    Mazari FAK; Wattoo GM; Kazzazi NH; Kolar KM; Olubowale OO; Rogers CE; Azmy IA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):283-293. PubMed ID: 29369979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A direct comparison of porcine (Strattice™) and bovine (Surgimend™) acellular dermal matrices in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.
    Ball JF; Sheena Y; Tarek Saleh DM; Forouhi P; Benyon SL; Irwin MS; Malata CM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 28624524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Immediate breast reconstruction using porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™): long-term outcomes and complications.
    Salzberg CA; Dunavant C; Nocera N
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Mar; 66(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 23153519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prepectoral versus Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Comparison of Outcomes.
    Talwar AA; Lanni MA; Ryan IA; Kodali P; Bernstein E; McAuliffe PB; Broach RB; Serletti JM; Butler PD; Fosnot J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Feb; 153(2):281e-290e. PubMed ID: 37159266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revision Incidence after Immediate Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using National Real-World Data.
    Becherer BE; Heeg E; Young-Afat DA; Vrancken Peeters MTFD; Rakhorst HA; Mureau MAM;
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 36729987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.
    Vardanian AJ; Clayton JL; Roostaeian J; Shirvanian V; Da Lio A; Lipa JE; Crisera C; Festekjian JH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Nov; 128(5):403e-410e. PubMed ID: 22030500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
    Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix Type in Treatment of Capsular Contracture in Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Samuels K; Millet E; Wong L
    Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Dec; 44(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 37595294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
    Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of clinical outcomes of acellular dermal matrix with and without radiation sterilization process in immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.
    Han WY; Han SJ; Kim EK; Han HH; Eom JS
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Dec; 87():461-466. PubMed ID: 37944457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
    Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
    Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-stage breast reconstruction using Strattice™: A retrospective study.
    Dikmans RE; El Morabit F; Ottenhof MJ; Tuinder SM; Twisk JW; Moues C; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Feb; 69(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 26723835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix in revision breast surgery: long-term outcomes and safety with neopectoral pockets.
    Maxwell GP; Gabriel A
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 May; 34(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 24692599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ADM-Assisted Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Setting: Long-Term Results.
    Polotto S; Pedrazzi G; Bergamini M; D'Abbiero N; Cattelani L
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2023 Oct; 23(7):704-711. PubMed ID: 37479666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revisions in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: How Does Direct-to-Implant Measure Up?
    Clarke-Pearson EM; Lin AM; Hertl C; Austen WG; Colwell AS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Jun; 137(6):1690-1699. PubMed ID: 27219225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timeline and Incidence of Postoperative Complications in Prepectoral, Dual-Plane, and Total Submuscular Alloplastic Reconstruction With and Without Biosynthetic Scaffold Usage.
    Chen Y; Wang ML; Black GG; Bernstein JL; Chinta M; Otterburn DM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Jun; 90(6S Suppl 5):S466-S471. PubMed ID: 36880719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bostwick Autoderm and Implant Technique: Improved Outcomes for Obese Patients in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
    Danker S; Schmitt M; Smith N; Chong HJ; Sandholm PH; Murphy JA; Ladizinsky DA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 147(2):187e-195e. PubMed ID: 33165289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
    Safran T; Al-Badarin F; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Dionisopoulos T
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):22e-31e. PubMed ID: 35499675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.