BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36729988)

  • 1. Immediate Breast Cancer Reconstruction with or without Dermal Matrix or Synthetic Mesh Support: A Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
    Murphy D; O'Donnell JP; Ryan ÉJ; Lane O'Neill B; Boland MR; Lowery AJ; Kerin MJ; McInerney NM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):563e-574e. PubMed ID: 36729988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Zhang T; Ye J; Tian T
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 Mar; 48(5):925-935. PubMed ID: 37464216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
    Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
    Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A direct comparison of porcine (Strattice™) and bovine (Surgimend™) acellular dermal matrices in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.
    Ball JF; Sheena Y; Tarek Saleh DM; Forouhi P; Benyon SL; Irwin MS; Malata CM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 28624524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review: Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies Comparing Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Versus Without ADM.
    Ng TP; Loo BYK; Yong N; Chia CLK; Lohsiriwat V
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 May; 31(5):3366-3376. PubMed ID: 38285304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Allograft vs Xenograft Bioprosthetic Mesh in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Blinded Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Asaad M; Selber JC; Adelman DM; Baumann DP; Hassid VJ; Crosby MA; Liu J; Butler CE; Clemens MW
    Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Nov; 41(12):NP1931-NP1939. PubMed ID: 33693461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ADMs and synthetic meshes improve implant-based breast reconstruction aesthetics, but at what cost?
    Samaha Y; Chen J; Ray EC
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 May; 80():178-181. PubMed ID: 37028245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADM) in women undergoing pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction increase operative success versus non-use of ADM in the same setting? A systematic review protocol.
    Cook H; Zargaran D; Glynou SP; Hamilton S; Mosahebi A
    Syst Rev; 2024 Jun; 13(1):153. PubMed ID: 38849880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Brandberg Y; Frisell J
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Oct; 4(10):e2127806. PubMed ID: 34596671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].
    Billon R; Hersant B; Bosc R; Meningaud JP
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30738819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implant Based Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix: Safety Data From an Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial in the Setting of Breast Cancer Treatment.
    Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Roy PG; Johansson H; Brandberg Y; Eriksen C; Frisell J
    Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 30308615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Human, Porcine, and Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.
    Pires GR; Moss WD; Hosein RC; Overschmidt BT; Magno-Padron DA; Agarwal JP; McFarland MM; Casucci T; Kwok AC
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Dec; 89(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 36416706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Dermal Matrix Brand in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.
    Johnson AC; Colakoglu S; Siddikoglu D; Li A; Kaoutzanis C; Cohen JB; Chong TW; Mathes DW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 35499525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh.
    Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
    BJS Open; 2021 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33609398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast Reconstruction Outcomes with and without Strattice: Long-Term Outcomes of a Multicenter Study Comparing Strattice Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction with Submuscular Implant Reconstruction.
    Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; Johnson RK; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Harvey JR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Jul; 152(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 36728408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
    Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Updated Evidence of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.
    Lee KT; Mun GH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):600-10. PubMed ID: 26438439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human acellular dermis increases surgical site infection and overall complication profile when compared with submuscular breast reconstruction: An updated meta-analysis incorporating new products
    Smith JM; Broyles JM; Guo Y; Tuffaha SH; Mathes D; Sacks JM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Nov; 71(11):1547-1556. PubMed ID: 30093286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.