These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36731529)

  • 21. Speed invariance of tactile texture perception.
    Boundy-Singer ZM; Saal HP; Bensmaia SJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Oct; 118(4):2371-2377. PubMed ID: 28724777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Effect of Task Instruction on Haptic Texture Processing: The Neural Underpinning of Roughness and Spatial Density Perception.
    Eck J; Kaas AL; Mulders JL; Hausfeld L; Kourtzi Z; Goebel R
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Jan; 26(1):384-401. PubMed ID: 25491119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Synthesizing the Roughness of Textured Surfaces for an Encountered-Type Haptic Display Using Spatiotemporal Encoding.
    Kim Y; Kim S; Oh U; Kim YJ
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2021; 14(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 32746377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Capture of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion by moving and static sound.
    Chen L; Zhou X
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(4):369-89. PubMed ID: 21864460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Decoding visual roughness perception: an fMRI study.
    Kim J; Bülthoff I; Bülthoff HH
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2018; 35(3-4):212-217. PubMed ID: 30592429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influences of intra- and crossmodal grouping on visual and tactile Ternus apparent motion.
    Chen L; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():152-62. PubMed ID: 20659437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of subliminal haptic perception on the preference discrimination of roughness and compliance.
    Hilsenrat M; Reiner M
    Brain Res Bull; 2011 Jun; 85(5):267-70. PubMed ID: 21440607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sequential neural processes of tactile-visual crossmodal working memory.
    Ohara S; Lenz F; Zhou YD
    Neuroscience; 2006 Apr; 139(1):299-309. PubMed ID: 16324794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Human roughness perception and possible factors effecting roughness sensation.
    Aktar T; Chen J; Ettelaie R; Holmes M; Henson B
    J Texture Stud; 2017 Jun; 48(3):181-192. PubMed ID: 28573724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of receptor density on the tactile perception of roughness: implications for neural mechanisms of texture perception.
    Gescheider GA; Wright JH
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2021 Sep; 38(3):202-213. PubMed ID: 34387144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prefrontal cortex and somatosensory cortex in tactile crossmodal association: an independent component analysis of ERP recordings.
    Ku Y; Ohara S; Wang L; Lenz FA; Hsiao SS; Bodner M; Hong B; Zhou YD
    PLoS One; 2007 Aug; 2(8):e771. PubMed ID: 17712419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The implicit use of spatial information develops later for crossmodal than for intramodal temporal processing.
    Röder B; Pagel B; Heed T
    Cognition; 2013 Feb; 126(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 23099123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of surface gloss and roughness on color constancy for real 3-D objects.
    Granzier JJ; Vergne R; Gegenfurtner KR
    J Vis; 2014 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 24563527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Shape from shading under inconsistent illumination.
    Wilder JD; Adams WJ; Murray RF
    J Vis; 2019 Jun; 19(6):2. PubMed ID: 31166580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals.
    Mayer KM; Di Luca M; Ernst MO
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():2-9. PubMed ID: 23953664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When Sandpaper Is 'Kiki' and Satin Is 'Bouba': an Exploration of the Associations Between Words, Emotional States, and the Tactile Attributes of Everyday Materials.
    Etzi R; Spence C; Zampini M; Gallace A
    Multisens Res; 2016; 29(1-3):133-55. PubMed ID: 27311294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The arousing power of everyday materials: an analysis of the physiological and behavioral responses to visually and tactually presented textures.
    Etzi R; Gallace A
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jun; 234(6):1659-66. PubMed ID: 26842855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Crossmodal associations between visual textures and temperature concepts.
    Barbosa Escobar F; Velasco C; Byrne DV; Wang QJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Apr; 76(4):731-761. PubMed ID: 35414309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Duration Comparisons for Vision and Touch Are Dependent on Presentation Order and Temporal Context.
    Gao Y; Miller KN; Rudd ME; Webster MA; Jiang F
    Front Integr Neurosci; 2021; 15():664264. PubMed ID: 34248513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.