These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36731864)

  • 1. The efficacy of different implant surface decontamination methods using spectrophotometric analysis: an
    Giffi R; Pietropaoli D; Mancini L; Tarallo F; Sahrmann P; Marchetti E
    J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2023 Aug; 53(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 36731864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro cleaning potential of three different implant debridement methods.
    Sahrmann P; Ronay V; Hofer D; Attin T; Jung RE; Schmidlin PR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Mar; 26(3):314-9. PubMed ID: 24373056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro cleaning potential of three implant debridement methods. Simulation of the non-surgical approach.
    Ronay V; Merlini A; Attin T; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):151-155. PubMed ID: 26799360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In Vitro Efficacy of Three Different Nonsurgical Implant Surface Decontamination Methods in Three Different Defect Configurations.
    Iatrou P; Chamilos C; Nickles K; Ratka C; Eickholz P; Petsos H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):271-280. PubMed ID: 33909716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro surgical and non-surgical air-polishing efficacy for implant surface decontamination in three different defect configurations.
    Tuchscheerer V; Eickholz P; Dannewitz B; Ratka C; Zuhr O; Petsos H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):1743-1754. PubMed ID: 32813077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro efficacy of three different implant surface decontamination methods in three different defect configurations.
    Keim D; Nickles K; Dannewitz B; Ratka C; Eickholz P; Petsos H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jun; 30(6):550-558. PubMed ID: 31009116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro effect of different implant decontamination methods in three intraosseous defect configurations.
    Luengo F; Sanz-Esporrín J; Noguerol F; Sanz-Martín I; Sanz-Sánchez I; Sanz M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Nov; 33(11):1087-1097. PubMed ID: 35997508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Location of unaccessible implant surface areas during debridement in simulated peri-implantitis therapy.
    Steiger-Ronay V; Merlini A; Wiedemeier DB; Schmidlin PR; Attin T; Sahrmann P
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 29183313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Significance of implant design on the efficacy of different peri-implantitis decontamination protocols.
    Sanz-Martín I; Paeng K; Park H; Cha JK; Jung UW; Sanz M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jun; 25(6):3589-3597. PubMed ID: 33170374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cleaning potential of glycine air-flow application in an in vitro peri-implantitis model.
    Sahrmann P; Ronay V; Sener B; Jung RE; Attin T; Schmidlin PR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):666-70. PubMed ID: 22409152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro efficacy of non-surgical and surgical implant surface decontamination methods in three different defect configurations in the presence or absence of a suprastructure.
    Korello K; Eickholz P; Zuhr O; Ratka C; Petsos H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):549-563. PubMed ID: 36918345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decontamination of biofilm-contaminated implant surfaces: An in vitro evaluation.
    Ichioka Y; Virto L; Nuevo P; Gamonal JD; Derks J; Larsson L; Sanz M; Berglundh T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Oct; 34(10):1058-1072. PubMed ID: 37469250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between four different implant surface debridement methods: an in-vitro experimental study.
    Mensi M; Viviani L; Agosti R; Scotti E; Garzetti G; Calza S
    Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Oct; 69(5):286-294. PubMed ID: 33174712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Photo/mechanical and physical implant surface decontamination approaches in conjunction with surgical peri-implantitis treatment: A systematic review.
    Ramanauskaite A; Schwarz F; Cafferata EA; Sahrmann P
    J Clin Periodontol; 2023 Jun; 50 Suppl 26():317-335. PubMed ID: 36709953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cleaning effects of decontamination methods on clinically failed TiUnite implants and their impacts on surface roughness and chemistry: An in vitro pilot study.
    Qian Y; Tong Z; Cai B; Zhu W; Si M
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2022 May; 15(2):149-165. PubMed ID: 35546724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of implant surface debridement using particle beams at differing air pressures.
    Wei MCT; Tran C; Meredith N; Walsh LJ
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2017 Aug; 3(4):148-153. PubMed ID: 29744193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of decontamination efficacy of two electrolyte cleaning methods to diode laser, plasma, and air-abrasive devices.
    Zipprich H; Weigl P; Di Gianfilippo R; Steigmann L; Henrich D; Wang HL; Schlee M; Ratka C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4549-4558. PubMed ID: 35322316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of implant surface mechanical instrumentation methods on peri-implantitis: An
    Munakata M; Suzuki A; Yamaguchi K; Kataoka Y; Sanda M
    J Dent Sci; 2022 Apr; 17(2):891-896. PubMed ID: 35756780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cleaning potential of different air abrasive powders and their impact on implant surface roughness.
    Matsubara VH; Leong BW; Leong MJL; Lawrence Z; Becker T; Quaranta A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 22(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31837107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of different cleaning methods on the surface and temperature of failed titanium implants: an in vitro study.
    Hakki SS; Tatar G; Dundar N; Demiralp B
    Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):563-571. PubMed ID: 28160204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.