These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36732065)

  • 1. Survey of selective electrode deactivation attitudes and practices by cochlear implant audiologists.
    Sander KL; Warren SE; Mendel LL
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2023 May; 24(3):167-175. PubMed ID: 36732065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: A computational approach.
    Sagi E; Svirsky MA
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():316-328. PubMed ID: 30396747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a clinical method for selective electrode deactivation in cochlear implant programming.
    Warren SE; Atcherson SR
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2023; 17():1157673. PubMed ID: 37063101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of cochlear implant electrode deactivation on speech perception and in predicting device failure.
    Zeitler DM; Lalwani AK; Roland JT; Habib MG; Gudis D; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 18833018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical use of electrode differentiation to enhance programming of cochlear implants.
    Saleh SM; Saeed SR; Meerton L; Moore DR; Vickers DA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14 Suppl 4():S16-8. PubMed ID: 24533757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear Implant Practice Patterns: The U.S. Trends with Pediatric Patients.
    Hemmingson C; Messersmith JJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):722-733. PubMed ID: 30222542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of Tinnitus on Cochlear Implant Programming.
    Pierzycki RH; Corner C; Fielden CA; Kitterick PT
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519836624. PubMed ID: 30880643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decoding Billing Practices in Cochlear Implant Programs.
    Hall MW; Prentiss SM; Coto J; Zwolan TA; Holcomb MA
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):477-486. PubMed ID: 34483248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audiology Practices in the Preoperative Evaluation and Management of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidates.
    Prentiss S; Snapp H; Zwolan T
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Feb; 146(2):136-142. PubMed ID: 31830215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of electrode deactivation on speech recognition in multichannel cochlear implant recipients.
    Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Nov; 18(6):324-334. PubMed ID: 28793847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Processing of speech temporal and spectral information by users of auditory brainstem implants and cochlear implants.
    Azadpour M; McKay CM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e192-203. PubMed ID: 25010634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory performance of post-lingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients using electrode deactivation based on postoperative cone beam CT images.
    Danieli F; Dermacy T; do Amaral MSA; Reis ACMB; Gnansia D; Hyppolito MA
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Apr; 278(4):977-986. PubMed ID: 32588169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deactivating Cochlear Implant Electrodes Based on Pitch Information for Users of the ACE Strategy.
    Vickers D; Degun A; Canas A; Stainsby T; Vanpoucke F
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():115-123. PubMed ID: 27080652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audiologists' preferences in programming cochlear implants: A preliminary report.
    Browning LM; Nie Y; Rout A; Heiner M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jul; 21(4):179-191. PubMed ID: 31900086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audiologists' knowledge of cochlear implants and their related referrals to the cochlear implant centre: Pilot study findings from UK.
    Chundu S; Buhagiar R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Sep; 14(4):213-24. PubMed ID: 23394596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing Channel Interaction Through Cochlear Implant Programming May Improve Speech Perception: Current Focusing and Channel Deactivation.
    Bierer JA; Litvak L
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictors of Postoperative Electrode Deactivation Among Adult Cochlear Implantees.
    Wen C; Hwa TP; Kaufman AC; Brant JA; Eliades SJ; Bigelow DC; Ruckenstein MJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jul; 42(6):e675-e683. PubMed ID: 33625193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevalence of Extracochlear Electrodes: Computerized Tomography Scans, Cochlear Implant Maps, and Operative Reports.
    Holder JT; Kessler DM; Noble JH; Gifford RH; Labadie RF
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):e325-e331. PubMed ID: 29738386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contralateral acoustic hearing aid use in adult unilateral cochlear implant recipients: Current provision, practice, and clinical experience in the UK.
    Fielden CA; Kitterick PT
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 May; 17(3):132-45. PubMed ID: 27078521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.