These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36732255)
1. Non-native talkers and listeners and the perceptual benefits of clear speech. Jung YJ; Dmitrieva O J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):137. PubMed ID: 36732255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners. Meemann K; Smiljanić R J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Bent T; Bradlow AR J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1600-10. PubMed ID: 14514213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptual consequences of native and non-native clear speech. Kato M; Baese-Berk MM J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1246. PubMed ID: 35232086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants. Ji C; Galvin JJ; Chang YP; Xu A; Fu QJ J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):532-54. PubMed ID: 24686901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception. Peng ZE; Wang LM J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation? Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accent Intelligibility Differences in Noise Across Native and Nonnative Accents: Effects of Talker-Listener Pairing at Acoustic-Phonetic and Lexical Levels. Stringer L; Iverson P J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jul; 62(7):2213-2226. PubMed ID: 31251681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. Bradlow AR; Bent T J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):272-84. PubMed ID: 12141353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity. Pinet M; Iverson P; Huckvale M J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for older adults with hearing loss. Ferguson SH J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):779-90. PubMed ID: 22223894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effect of Talker and Listener Depressive Symptoms on Speech Intelligibility. Yi H; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4269-4281. PubMed ID: 31738862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension. Peng ZE; Wang LM J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2772. PubMed ID: 27250170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bidirectional clear speech perception benefit for native and high-proficiency non-native talkers and listeners: intelligibility and accentedness. Smiljanić R; Bradlow AR J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4020-31. PubMed ID: 22225056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conversational and clear speech intelligibility of /bVd/ syllables produced by native and non-native English speakers. Rogers CL; DeMasi TM; Krause JC J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):410-23. PubMed ID: 20649235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speaking Clearly for Older Adults With Normal Hearing: The Role of Speaking Rate. Krause JC; Panagiotopoulos AP J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3851-3859. PubMed ID: 31580758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech. Bent T; Buchwald A; Pisoni DB J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2660-9. PubMed ID: 19894843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers. Calandruccio L; Bradlow AR; Dhar S J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Across-talker effects on non-native listeners' vowel perception in noise. Bent T; Kewley-Port D; Ferguson SH J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3142-51. PubMed ID: 21110609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis. Stibbard RM; Lee JI J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):433-42. PubMed ID: 16875239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]