These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36732851)
1. Does tidal volume challenge improve the feasibility of pulse pressure variation in patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Wang X; Liu S; Gao J; Zhang Y; Huang T Crit Care; 2023 Feb; 27(1):45. PubMed ID: 36732851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position. Shi R; Ayed S; Moretto F; Azzolina D; De Vita N; Gavelli F; Carelli S; Pavot A; Lai C; Monnet X; Teboul JL Crit Care; 2022 Jul; 26(1):219. PubMed ID: 35850771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of using tidal volume challenge to improve the reliability of pulse pressure variation reduced in low tidal volume ventilated critically ill patients with decreased respiratory system compliance. Xu Y; Guo J; Wu Q; Chen J BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 May; 22(1):137. PubMed ID: 35508962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in pulse pressure variation to assess preload responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing activity: an observational study. Hamzaoui O; Shi R; Carelli S; Sztrymf B; Prat D; Jacobs F; Monnet X; Gouëzel C; Teboul JL Br J Anaesth; 2021 Oct; 127(4):532-538. PubMed ID: 34246460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation. Jun JH; Chung RK; Baik HJ; Chung MH; Hyeon JS; Lee YG; Park SH BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):142. PubMed ID: 31390982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does End-Expiratory Occlusion Test Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Si X; Song X; Lin Q; Nie Y; Zhang G; Xu H; Chen M; Wu J; Guan X Shock; 2020 Dec; 54(6):751-760. PubMed ID: 32433213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do changes in pulse pressure variation and inferior vena cava distensibility during passive leg raising and tidal volume challenge detect preload responsiveness in case of low tidal volume ventilation? Taccheri T; Gavelli F; Teboul JL; Shi R; Monnet X Crit Care; 2021 Mar; 25(1):110. PubMed ID: 33736672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Prone Neurosurgical Patients Undergoing Protective Ventilation: Role of Dynamic Indices, Tidal Volume Challenge, and End-Expiratory Occlusion Test. Messina A; Montagnini C; Cammarota G; Giuliani F; Muratore L; Baggiani M; Bennett V; Della Corte F; Navalesi P; Cecconi M Anesth Analg; 2020 Mar; 130(3):752-761. PubMed ID: 31651455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of respiratory rate and tidal volume on pulse pressure variation in healthy lungs-a generalized additive model approach may help overcome limitations. Enevoldsen J; Brandsborg B; Juhl-Olsen P; Rees SE; Thaysen HV; Scheeren TWL; Vistisen ST J Clin Monit Comput; 2024 Feb; 38(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 37968547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A challenge with 5 cmH2O of positive end-expiratory pressure predicts fluid responsiveness in neurosurgery patients with protective ventilation: an observational study. Ali A; Aygun E; Abdullah T; Bolsoy-Deveci S; Orhan-Sungur M; Canbaz M; Ozkan Akinci I Minerva Anestesiol; 2019 Nov; 85(11):1184-1192. PubMed ID: 31213047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ability of a New Smartphone Pulse Pressure Variation and Cardiac Output Application to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. Joosten A; Boudart C; Vincent JL; Vanden Eynden F; Barvais L; Van Obbergh L; Rinehart J; Desebbe O Anesth Analg; 2019 Jun; 128(6):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 31094781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on the predictability of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Chen YH; Lai YJ; Huang CY; Lin HL; Huang CC Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10186. PubMed ID: 33986355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Respiratory variation in the internal jugular vein does not predict fluid responsiveness in the prone position during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a prospective cohort study. Wu M; Dai Z; Liang Y; Liu X; Zheng X; Zhang W; Bo J BMC Anesthesiol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):360. PubMed ID: 37932674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of respiratory variation of aortic peak velocity in predicting children receiving mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wang X; Jiang L; Liu S; Ge Y; Gao J Crit Care; 2019 Nov; 23(1):372. PubMed ID: 31757222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Change in cardiac output during Trendelenburg maneuver is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position under protective ventilation. Yonis H; Bitker L; Aublanc M; Perinel Ragey S; Riad Z; Lissonde F; Louf-Durier A; Debord S; Gobert F; Tapponnier R; Guérin C; Richard JC Crit Care; 2017 Dec; 21(1):295. PubMed ID: 29208025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation. Myatra SN; Prabu NR; Divatia JV; Monnet X; Kulkarni AP; Teboul JL Crit Care Med; 2017 Mar; 45(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 27922879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, and pleth variability index in predicting fluid responsiveness during different positive end expiratory pressure in prone position. Chen Y; Fu Q; Mi WD Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2015 Apr; 37(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 25936706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Changes in PPV Using a Tidal Volume Challenge with a Passive Leg Raising Test to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Ventilated Using Low Tidal Volume. Elsayed AI; Selim KA; Zaghla HE; Mowafy HE; Fakher MA Indian J Crit Care Med; 2021 Jun; 25(6):685-690. PubMed ID: 34316150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure. Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pulse Pressure Variation Adjusted by Respiratory Changes in Pleural Pressure, Rather Than by Tidal Volume, Reliably Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Liu Y; Wei LQ; Li GQ; Yu X; Li GF; Li YM Crit Care Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 26457754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]